United Forum
Go Back   United Forum > Manchester United > Football
Closed Thread
 
Unread 18-03-2016, 03:51 AM
Alex Jones was Right
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanMUFC
Like the title suggests.
What would the pros and cons be?
Surely he'd be smart enough to get an experienced head alongside him.
Surely he'd look at bringing in players that will fight for the shirt.
The reaction on here is quite possibly a toys out of pram reaction to Pip going to city.
You've made a very persuasive case. Giggs it is.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanMUFC
His career and experience as the most successful british footballer.
His experience and knowledge of the club.
It's obviously a risk, he's not inheriting Messi, Xavi and Iniesta but we could give him a go at building it as he will be there for the long term should he be successful.
With that reasoning, Bobby charlton should have been given the job years ago.

The novice who inherited messi, Xavi and iniesta, the novice everyone uses to support the idea of Giggs, was successful and didn't stay for the long term.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gruber
This tbh
Keeping Jose would make more sense.
 
Unread 18-03-2016, 04:48 AM
waynes ear's
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparky***
.#
pros - £#%&! off

cons - £#%&! off

£#%&! off
Brah 👍
 
Unread 18-03-2016, 06:09 AM
Gruber
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jammy Dodger

Keeping Jose would make more sense.
Doesn't do longevity though, does he?
 
Unread 18-03-2016, 07:01 AM
Venceremos
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gruber
Doesn't do longevity though, does he?
He didn't want to until he'd experienced and conquered Serie A and La Liga.

Then from 2013 he said wanted to be at English club until his 60s when he would try and do something with the Portugese...

Fergie going for Moyes meant he reluctantly went back to Chelsea and while United have used the last 3 years to £#%&! themselves in every department and will take a lot more work, Mourinho's singular disaster and subsequent sacking means we have one last chance at the obvious. Will the club take it though..?
 
Unread 18-03-2016, 07:32 AM
yoda
 
Default

'He knows the club' people keep saying.

Why is this a thing? So he knows where the biscuits are kept in the canteen
already and we don't have to give him any new training kit. Nice one,
give him the job then.

Means absolutely £#%&! all in the grand scheme of things.
 
Unread 18-03-2016, 07:54 AM
King Eric
 
Default

I love Giggs, but now isn't the time to blood a novice, we are so deep in the mire, only the best can get us out of it. He's waiting patiently and the future of our great club is in the balance, without him we could carry on being the next Liverpool, with him, we could be back at the top fairly quickly. Nothing's certain in football, but looking at percentages, Mourhino is a winner of the biggest trophies, Giggs has no experience and is a huge risk.
 
Unread 18-03-2016, 08:04 AM
Clarkie
 
Default

He's got the job....

More of a question of "Will he be that bad" as opposed to "would be that bad"

Personally I think he'll be giving the sack after 3 months. He already said those 4 matches gave him sleepless nights. Also said he got scared doing his coaching badges.

Great player. One of my football heroes but.....we're done if he gets the job
 
Unread 18-03-2016, 08:28 AM
barca99
 
Default

Said it before, had Giggs taken over (temp or not) after Norwich or even Stoke we would easily be in the top 4 now.

That said I would be more pissed off if Giggs takes over in the summer than i would if LvG ended up staying.

Get Mourinho in the summer and the good times are back 100%.
 
Unread 18-03-2016, 10:35 AM
ryanMUFC
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jammy Dodger
You've made a very persuasive case. Giggs it is.
I don't need to make a case for him. The club might if they appoint him..
 
Unread 18-03-2016, 01:14 PM
silv
 
Default

Mixed feelings

We are a joke as it stands. How bad do we want to rise to the top again?
 
Unread 18-03-2016, 01:20 PM
dunk
 
Default

Yes.

The club needs to get him out of its system though, so give it him now.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Venceremos
He didn't want to until he'd experienced and conquered Serie A and La Liga.

Then from 2013 he said wanted to be at English club until his 60s when he would try and do something with the Portugese...

Fergie going for Moyes meant he reluctantly went back to Chelsea and while United have used the last 3 years to £#%&! themselves in every department and will take a lot more work, Mourinho's singular disaster and subsequent sacking means we have one last chance at the obvious. Will the club take it though..?
You are so full of £#%&!ing shit

£#%&!ing madridista :£#%&!er:
 
Unread 18-03-2016, 01:41 PM
MagnificentSeven
 
Default

been said before but he needs managerial experience before taking us over. if moyes and van gaal who have been in the manager game for donkeys turned out to be utter disasters, it doesn't bear thinking about how bad we will be under him.
 
Unread 18-03-2016, 05:22 PM
Ashley's Grime
 
Default

Klopp, Guardiola and Conte in the league next year, they won't give a shit if Giggs takes over. They WILL give a shit if Mourinho takes over.
Closed Thread
Similar Threads for: Would Giggs be that bad as the next MUFC manager?
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PICTURED: Ryan Giggs spotted for the first time since stepping down as manager of Wales fred tissue Football Auto-Threads 0 22-06-2022 01:00 PM
Ryan Giggs ‘in the frame’ to be next Manchester United manager, says Mark Hughes fred tissue Football Auto-Threads 0 11-10-2020 12:20 PM
Giggs' first club as a manager? TheFatGoth Football 45 22-09-2016 06:32 PM
Scholes backs Giggs for manager Cream Football 24 18-03-2016 05:44 PM
Guardiola or Giggs as manager silv Football 40 11-10-2015 09:39 AM
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:07 PM.
Copyright ©2006 - 2024 utdforum.com. This site is in no way affiliated to Manchester United Football Club.