|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
He's easily proved himself the better manager imo. Pep can never do a Porto and is unlikely to do an Inter. If Mourinho stayed at United and had consistent success. Well... Game over. |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Can't see a PM, btw. Your wi-fi/4G gone down? |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Mourinho is getting a tune out of a group of players that Pep would never lower himself to coach. Maybe because he can only coach the best of the best? Plus you're forgetting the reason they've got Delph at left back is because their new £50m left back is injured |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
United's spending has also been huge post-Fergie, so he'd have got the financial backing at United, too. |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Off you £#%&!. Take the others with you you try-hard little weirdo |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
You £#%&!ing bellsniff. |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Blind is a decent squad player, nothing more (Bunks) Carrick is 36 Valencia can't kick a ball with his left foot Mata, possibly Martial and Rashford are both progressing well under the current manager And yes I'd say both Otamendi and Komoany are more suited to Pep than Smalling and Jones Would Mourinho be able to win trophies with this City squad - Yes Would Pep be able to win trophies with this United squad - doubtful Not saying for one minute he isn't a very good coach, but looking at his career and the choices he's made it does look like everything has to fit his style perfectly and if it doesn't he'll just throw a shit load of money at it As for the spending, yeah I agree he would have been backed. But our squad would have needed a complete overhaul, no chance was he going to put his reputation on the line for that As you said a large group of the current city squad was there before him, so all he needed to do was add players around the current group of top players (for half a million of course). |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Hart, Sagna, Clichy, Otamendi, Mangala, Fernando, Fernandinho, Navas, Aguero, De Bruyne, Iheanacho, Caballero, Kolarov, Demichellis, Toure, Nasri, Sterling, Bony. 11 of those 18 have already been binned and Mangala and Toure are clearly not wanted. Settled group? Meanwhile United played on Saturday with 7 starters Mourinho inherited. The league isn’t over. We can win this weekend. It’s so early to be getting defeatist imo and inventing excuses for City being so far ahead. |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Anyways yes, they still have to come to us, Anfield, Wembley, The Emirates and have to play Spurs at home, Chelsea at home and us at home. It is far from over! |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
So what you're saying is Mourinho still has a load of shit @#%&!s left over from the previous manager while Pep has managed to replace a load of Citys shit @#%&!s with better players? Kompany, Otamendi, Silva, Fernandinho, De Bruyne, Sterling, Agureo that's a very good group of players to build on wouldn't you say? And who's making excuses for City being so far ahead? It's a fact that they're ahead of us in terms of building a squad for their current manager and yet here we are, as you say still in the hunt. |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Basically he’s had a handful that he’s felt he can build with. But he’s torn everything down. They finished on the same points as us when he was hired, this despite us having a season wrecked by injury and being guided by a useless manager. Guardiola is simply doing a very good job right now. You’d do better to just accept that. But will it last? City aren’t unbeatable. They’ve just squeezed past Moysie’s West Ham. It just feels like we are already trotting out excuses for them winning the title, when most on here pretty much guaranteed Mou would win a league with us and see off Fraudiola. Too early to be giving up imo. |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
He had a very good group of players, some of which were arguably the best players in the league. That's a lot more than what he would have add if he took the job here. But that's why he didn't, it would have been too much of f a challenge and something he never would have risked his reputation on. Thats why the City job was the safest job to take, obviously adding the fact he's got a blank cheque book to make as many sweeping changes as he wants I haven't once said he's not doing a good job. I have said that he's not some sort of messiah, he's a good manager that either needs the best players or a bottomless pit of money I'm not giving up pal, but I understand that Mourinho's united is no where near the finished article because he has limitations that Guardiola doesn't have to deal with. Obviously you'll be hoping that he doesn't finish the rebuild, but fact is the rebuild has been made that much harder because of the dross that Van Gaal/Woodward bought and we've struggled to shift |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Guardiola took over an underachieving Barca and quickly made the best side in their history. I realise Mou chose the challenge of plucky little Real Madrid around the same time so he gets the moral high ground, but the quality of football played by Guardiola’s sides is about him more than it is money. Otherwise after another £300m we’d be closer to them in that respect. By the way, United didn’t approach Guardiola. People close to him believe he would have preferred to come here. But we were set on the LvG to Giggs succession, and then were seduced by Mourinho. We will never know if Guardiola would have come here. Those in his circle believe he would. If that’s the case, Woodward should be killed. |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Guardiola is a bit bitter | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Manchester City have to be 'cold-minded' against bitter rivals United, insists Pep Guardiola | fred tissue | Football Auto-Threads | 0 | 05-11-2021 03:00 PM |
Bitter meltdown | The Stella Fella | Football | 75 | 20-04-2019 03:13 AM |
ITK or usual bitter bs ? | ScarFace | Football | 107 | 22-02-2016 12:45 PM |
Keano a bit bitter | thatsfuctit | Football | 56 | 07-04-2008 11:59 AM |