Duncan Edwards

Good article here

http://www.theguardian.com/football/...onder-greatest

At least we now know who Neo is.

What a £#%&!ing start to that article...

The difficult truth is that they will always be questions

In a national newspaper

As good as Phil Jones, I heard.

Originally Posted by dunk

What a £#%&!ing start to that article...



In a national newspaper

No idea why he gets so much kudos on here, he's a terrible journalist. "What's that you say? He said "what time's kick off!?!!"" Same old rehashed stories from years gone by published has his own excellent journalism. Plus he looks like a @#%&! to boot.

Originally Posted by believe

No idea why he gets so much kudos on here, he's a terrible journalist. "What's that you say? He said "what time's kick off!?!!"" Same old rehashed stories from years gone by published has his own excellent journalism. Plus he looks like a @#%&! to boot.

I don't get why he'd ask what time kick off is either, didn't every game kick off at 3 o'clock on Saturday

Originally Posted by dunk

What a £#%&!ing start to that article...



In a national newspaper

Nothing wrong with that.

Originally Posted by dunk

What a £#%&!ing start to that article...



In a national newspaper

It doesn't make sense because you've missed the last 4 words off the sentence.

Originally Posted by carlosartorial

It doesn't make sense because you've missed the last 4 words off the sentence.

Its the word 'they' as opposed to 'there', but proof reading failures aside, I thought it was a decent read.

Originally Posted by signed dc

Its the word 'they' as opposed to 'there', but proof reading failures aside, I thought it was a decent read.

But he then goes on to reference the questions so it's the correct phrasing. There's been a distinct lack of gumption from Dunk and yourself here DCers.

Originally Posted by Throw

But he then goes on to reference the questions so it's the correct phrasing. There's been a distinct lack of gumption from Dunk and yourself here DCers.

Still should be 'there' imho, so its you and Taylorers lacking gumption.

Originally Posted by carlosartorial

It doesn't make sense because you've missed the last 4 words off the sentence.

ffs Daniel will you just give carlo's blog a mention in your next rehashed story.

Originally Posted by Throw

But he then goes on to reference the questions so it's the correct phrasing. There's been a distinct lack of gumption from Dunk and yourself here DCers.

and definitely a lack of wit.

Originally Posted by signed dc

Still should be 'there' imho, so its you and Taylorers lacking gumption.

It changes the meaning of the sentence if you use there.

Originally Posted by signed dc

Still should be 'there' imho, so its you and Taylorers lacking gumption.

Heh heh. No.

Originally Posted by signed dc

Still should be 'there' imho, so its you and Taylorers lacking gumption.

agreed, big Dunc is not the question, the questions are about him

Originally Posted by Spock

agreed, big Dunc is not the question, the questions are about him

Well I didn't like the way it read anyway, feels clumsy.

Originally Posted by Spock

agreed, big Dunc is not the question, the questions are about him

What?

I've spoken to an independent adjudicator.
Either 'they' or 'there' are acceptable.

Originally Posted by Throw

But he then goes on to reference the questions so it's the correct phrasing. There's been a distinct lack of gumption from Dunk and yourself here DCers.

Any wit?