Erling Braut Håland has got to sign for United #2021

Originally Posted by Sparky***

https://twitter.com/FootyAccums/stat...72800042389514

barcelona isn't offering shit....they are £#%&!ing broke and more concerned with Messi and what his future holds

Did somebody fart before that picture was taken?

Originally Posted by windy waffles

Did you watch the West Brom game?

Regardless, he is the best striker in the world, has frightening pace and strength, you make room for him. Not like we have a plethora of strikers anyway.

Could be the reason why Cav hasn't been extended yet.

Yep city and Liverpool both drew 1-1 against wba last two months

He’s truly amazing is the @#%&! who owns him I can’t cope with.

Originally Posted by puressence

Yep city and Liverpool both drew 1-1 against wba last two months

He’s truly amazing is the @#%&! who owns him I can’t cope with.

Is he a bigger @#%&! than the ones who own Manchester United?

Originally Posted by Tuco

Is he a bigger @#%&! than the ones who own Manchester United?

Yep

Originally Posted by Sparky***

https://twitter.com/FootyAccums/stat...72800042389514

‘Hi is that @PipeSierra? It’s Roman Abramovic here, yeah, look I’m just ringing to let you know I’ll be going in with 90 mil for Haaland in the summer’

‘Hello @PipeSierra, this is Real Madrid, we’ll match Chelsea. And if it helps at all, our rivals Barcelona will too. Call us back!’

Originally Posted by Sparky***

https://twitter.com/FootyAccums/stat...72800042389514

At least I'll get to see him soon, then...

Originally Posted by Sparky***

https://twitter.com/FootyAccums/stat...72800042389514

Have Barca got the money?

I’ve always thought he was nailed on to go to city but doesn’t Guardiola hate Raiola?

Originally Posted by AK14

Have Barca got the money?

I’ve always thought he was nailed on to go to city but doesn’t Guardiola hate Raiola?

barca are massively skint right now for cash as they are still paying for dembele and griezman deals

Wont matter when Harry turns up at m16

Originally Posted by Sparky***

https://twitter.com/FootyAccums/stat...72800042389514

I can see him there for a few years.

I'd be amazed if he goes for less than £100m.

Even at that price he'd be a steal....if it wasn't for the inevitable circus that would follow.

Jimmy Greaves signed for the double winners in 1961 and became their greatest ever scorer. The team never competed for the title again while Greaves filled his boots individually.

Ian Wright joined a team who were champions in 2 of the previous 3 seasons. He became their (then) greatest ever scorer but team never competed for the title again until he was replaced by Anelka half way through 97/98/ season and team went on a run to the double. Alan Smith wrote in his book about how he felt intimidated by Wright's demands and personality and his game was badly affected.

Alan Shearer joined a team who had been 12 points clear the previous season and was signed to take his team to the next level. That team had a very flexible attack with goals shared. Became their greatest ever goalscorer but team went backwards whilst he dominated.

Gary Lineker joined the champions and dominated their goalscorers list for the season he was there but the team won nothing. He left for Barcelona and Everton were champios again the following season with the goals shared about.

Ruud Van Nistelrooy joined a team who had won the title 3 times in a row and a Champions League. He was brilliant individually for 5 seasons but the team "only" won one title. Immediately he left the team won 3 titles in a row and the Champions League. Perfectly bookended.

Haaland has joined a team that has regularly finished 2nd in the Bundesliga. He is scoring bagfuls of goals. The team are currently 6th.

Sometimes a team has to be set up specifically to get the best out of an individual and/or sometimes the players just get too reliant subconciously on a particular player. But it can cost the team while the fans worship the individual.

Team over player all day long. Haaland smacks to me of a fantastic individual who would take waay from the team.

I’d take the risk if it meant Martial’s miserable mug was consigned to the bench.

Originally Posted by wee man

Jimmy Greaves signed for the double winners in 1961 and became their greatest ever scorer. The team never competed for the title again while Greaves filled his boots individually.

Ian Wright joined a team who were champions in 2 of the previous 3 seasons. He became their (then) greatest ever scorer but team never competed for the title again until he was replaced by Anelka half way through 97/98/ season and team went on a run to the double. Alan Smith wrote in his book about how he felt intimidated by Wright's demands and personality and his game was badly affected.

Alan Shearer joined a team who had been 12 points clear the previous season and was signed to take his team to the next level. That team had a very flexible attack with goals shared. Became their greatest ever goalscorer but team went backwards whilst he dominated.

Gary Lineker joined the champions and dominated their goalscorers list for the season he was there but the team won nothing. He left for Barcelona and Everton were champios again the following season with the goals shared about.

Ruud Van Nistelrooy joined a team who had won the title 3 times in a row and a Champions League. He was brilliant individually for 5 seasons but the team "only" won one title. Immediately he left the team won 3 titles in a row and the Champions League. Perfectly bookended.

Haaland has joined a team that has regularly finished 2nd in the Bundesliga. He is scoring bagfuls of goals. The team are currently 6th.

Sometimes a team has to be set up specifically to get the best out of an individual and/or sometimes the players just get too reliant subconciously on a particular player. But it can cost the team while the fans worship the individual.

Team over player all day long. Haaland smacks to me of a fantastic individual who would take waay from the team.

Enjoyed that

Originally Posted by wee man

Jimmy Greaves signed for the double winners in 1961 and became their greatest ever scorer. The team never competed for the title again while Greaves filled his boots individually.

Ian Wright joined a team who were champions in 2 of the previous 3 seasons. He became their (then) greatest ever scorer but team never competed for the title again until he was replaced by Anelka half way through 97/98/ season and team went on a run to the double. Alan Smith wrote in his book about how he felt intimidated by Wright's demands and personality and his game was badly affected.

Alan Shearer joined a team who had been 12 points clear the previous season and was signed to take his team to the next level. That team had a very flexible attack with goals shared. Became their greatest ever goalscorer but team went backwards whilst he dominated.

Gary Lineker joined the champions and dominated their goalscorers list for the season he was there but the team won nothing. He left for Barcelona and Everton were champios again the following season with the goals shared about.

Ruud Van Nistelrooy joined a team who had won the title 3 times in a row and a Champions League. He was brilliant individually for 5 seasons but the team "only" won one title. Immediately he left the team won 3 titles in a row and the Champions League. Perfectly bookended.

Haaland has joined a team that has regularly finished 2nd in the Bundesliga. He is scoring bagfuls of goals. The team are currently 6th.

Sometimes a team has to be set up specifically to get the best out of an individual and/or sometimes the players just get too reliant subconciously on a particular player. But it can cost the team while the fans worship the individual.

Team over player all day long. Haaland smacks to me of a fantastic individual who would take waay from the team.

Bit of sour grapes there mate. Haaland takes away from the team he hasn’t even had a full season , is 20 years old , scoring tonnes of goals and you are branding him a player who takes away from the team

Nothing to do with have a shit defence or anything. It’s the strikers fault who scored all the goals why they are 6th

Originally Posted by wee man

Jimmy Greaves signed for the double winners in 1961 and became their greatest ever scorer. The team never competed for the title again while Greaves filled his boots individually.

Ian Wright joined a team who were champions in 2 of the previous 3 seasons. He became their (then) greatest ever scorer but team never competed for the title again until he was replaced by Anelka half way through 97/98/ season and team went on a run to the double. Alan Smith wrote in his book about how he felt intimidated by Wright's demands and personality and his game was badly affected.

Alan Shearer joined a team who had been 12 points clear the previous season and was signed to take his team to the next level. That team had a very flexible attack with goals shared. Became their greatest ever goalscorer but team went backwards whilst he dominated.

Gary Lineker joined the champions and dominated their goalscorers list for the season he was there but the team won nothing. He left for Barcelona and Everton were champios again the following season with the goals shared about.

Ruud Van Nistelrooy joined a team who had won the title 3 times in a row and a Champions League. He was brilliant individually for 5 seasons but the team "only" won one title. Immediately he left the team won 3 titles in a row and the Champions League. Perfectly bookended.

Haaland has joined a team that has regularly finished 2nd in the Bundesliga. He is scoring bagfuls of goals. The team are currently 6th.

Sometimes a team has to be set up specifically to get the best out of an individual and/or sometimes the players just get too reliant subconciously on a particular player. But it can cost the team while the fans worship the individual.

Team over player all day long. Haaland smacks to me of a fantastic individual who would take waay from the team.

Is the moral of the story to sign shit strikers?

Originally Posted by tatty

Is the moral of the story to sign shit strikers?

I’d say the moral is that it’s better to have 5 players with 10 goals than 1 with 50. Unless the 1 is Ronaldo.

Why no mention of rooney, Ronaldo or van persie?

Originally Posted by d_knight

Why no mention of rooney, Ronaldo or van persie?

Or The King.