Sky Sports Now: Man Utd interested in Harry Kane

Can't see us going for Kane this summer
He needs to confirm he's not a one season wonder

The amount of cash Levy would extract from Woody :shakehead:

Whatever Levy asked for, Woodward would give him more anyway ffs :shakehead:

5,035 views, 12 pages, 276 replies, five references to ginners being a Spurs fan, no bid made and zero £#%&!s given.

Originally Posted by PeakyBlinder

£#%&! me, our posts were almost identical.

Top Reds

poor form bunks bumping his old thread trying to hijack sparky's

Originally Posted by Ginners

poor form bunks bumping his old thread trying to hijack sparky's

I didn't even check, was flicking the telly and noticed SSN.

Poor form from sparky tbh...

Or I'm not arsed either way.

Still need that 200k ?

poor form sparky.

Originally Posted by Ginners

poor form sparky.

Originally Posted by The Weeknd

Not happening.

He has no interest in leaving Spurs.

For now...

Nope.

Originally Posted by ZiggyStardust

Kevin Phillips scored 30 league in a season nevermind 30 goals in all comps
Would you have wanted Utd to sign him

There are still a lot of question marks about Kane's overall game and I seriously doubt he will ever have a season close to this again

"£30m for wayne rooney?"

"£3.5m for Roy Keane?"

"£18m for michael carrick?"

Bye Wazza

Originally Posted by Sparky***

"£30m for wayne rooney?"

"£3.5m for Roy Keane?"

"£18m for michael carrick?"

Not sure what that means

Originally Posted by Sparky***

Who exactly is better?

Fair point. I was thinking more over the years. ..

Not convinced by lane but it's not my money

Originally Posted by ZiggyStardust

Not sure what that means

The same questions were being asked of those players who moved for big money to United.

sky sources are reporting this, lets be honest they haven't got a clue.

Originally Posted by ZiggyStardust

Not sure what that means

That we've made expensive signings from Premier League clubs before that were questioned but turned out all right?

I'm not sure Rooney fits that category to be honest, he was 17 and already a hit at international level when we signed him, it was a no-brainer.

Originally Posted by andyroo

That we've made expensive signings from Premier League clubs before that were questioned but turned out all right?

I'm not sure Rooney fits that category to be honest, he was 17 and already a hit at international level when we signed him, it was a no-brainer.

There was absolutely no question about Keane either. He had to be signed.

Carrick, yes, but that's because everyone wanted another Keane.

Originally Posted by Sparky***

The same questions were being asked of those players who moved for big money to United.

Carrick maybe

If you want to make the comparison to another centre forward in Rooney then Rooney didn't have a stellar season like Kane just had but his talent was unquestionable

How talented Kane really is, is very much open to question as players who had trained with him when he was on loan have said they didn't see a big talent in there

Originally Posted by dunk

There was absolutely no question about Keane either. He had to be signed.

Carrick, yes, but that's because everyone wanted another Keane.

I know I did

Keano had just been relegated, there were questions... glad we did though. Dogleash wasn't happy

I still think there are questions to be asked about Kane... not totally against signing him but not denying it's a risk.