Glazer family update

Originally Posted by dunk

I'd imagine so. Major tourist attraction and big part of the stadium tour..

really

you mean the munich stuff? they'd keep them anyhoo... i want the tunnel kept.

Originally Posted by Tumescent Throb

really

you mean the munich stuff? they'd keep them anyhoo... i want the tunnel kept.

This tunnel..

http://www.manutd.com/en/News-And-Fe...ch-tunnel.aspx

Terrific blokes who quite literally bleed red. Was having a pint in the Sir Ralph Abercrombie on Sunday when Avram and Joel stumbled in belting out the Wes Brown song. Top reds.

Originally Posted by ryanMUFC

They're still @#%&!s.
Imagine putting up ticket prices when there's more money than ever in the game...some clubs are putting season ticket prices down. I think we'd be better off with a new stadium than developing the south stand; especially with the new search regulations, disability sections etc.

Ryan, nooo...

Originally Posted by believe

You not boycotting now?

Stopped when ferie left

https://www.theguardian.com/football...ldren-15m-year

Originally Posted by elephantstone

https://www.theguardian.com/football...ldren-15m-year

Originally Posted by dunk

This tunnel..
]

Originally Posted by Tumescent Throb

A 'yes' would have sufficed.

I'm just glad the guys who marched the ones who represent Utd still go the matches 😂😂😂😂😂.

i feel like boycotting was a waste of time tbh.

Originally Posted by dunk

A 'yes' would have sufficed.

you posted a picture of the displays, not of the tunnel.

Originally Posted by Tumescent Throb

you posted a picture of the displays, not of the tunnel.

I didn't, I posted a link to 'The Munich Tunnel' as the tunnel you are referring to is 'affectionately' named these days, you obstinate bastard.

Originally Posted by Bunker Buster

Would.

Originally Posted by dragflick

Ryan, nooo...

It would have its benefits... developing the south stand won't have any benefit towards the atmosphere. They seem to be reconfigurating the stadium for those with disabilities anyway... the con being it pisses all over tradition.

Originally Posted by ryanMUFC

It would have its benefits... developing the south stand won't have any benefit towards the atmosphere. They seem to be reconfigurating the stadium for those with disabilities anyway... the con being it pisses all over tradition.

Originally Posted by dunk

I didn't, I posted a link to 'The Munich Tunnel' as the tunnel you are referring to is 'affectionately' named these days, you obstinate bastard.

you did, because you completely missed the point.

i couldn't care less where they put those displays in the new stand.

i want the tunnel preserved. regardless what they call it now.

Originally Posted by Jack Duckworth

i feel like boycotting was a waste of time tbh.

do you mean would have been a waste of time?

it wouldn't. nobody cared, though.

I didn't think throb could be more annoying. I was wrong. just c&p it. I don't care any more either.

Originally Posted by doudou

Ryan may be getting his wish as structurally OT is getting on a bit and it would probably cost more to replace each stand than it would build a new stadium though this would be a medium term project so can't see the Glazers addressing it any time soon. My guess is the club would do what Spurs have done and use the land they own around the current stadium to build a new one.

As an aside I recently met with the architects who drew up the plans to extend south stand around the time of the quads and they haven't been asked to look at it again.

Originally Posted by Chris Quayd

As an aside I recently met with the architects who drew up the plans to extend south stand around the time of the quads and they haven't been asked to look at it again.

can't think why