|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Is it true we've spent less / in line with (than) Stoke and Sunderland since they took over? Did we sell the best player in the world and replace him with obertan, Owen and Valencia? Have we really £#%&!ed £700 million on servicing debt. £#%&!ing glazer apologist. |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
we've actually spent more than bayern over the past 4 seasons. |
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
And if they did, they'd spend as much as it takes to get them challenging for the major trophies. Their owners have footballing aspirations not commercial ones. |
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Speculative punts because "there was no value in the market" as we had more important matters of paying off the PIK's. £#%&! the football. |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Wonderful owners eh?! Really pisses me off - we have a world class manager and if we were able to spend some of the money we self generate, we could piss this league. |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Stoke and Sunderland outspent us in one season iirc last 5 years net spend table http://transferleague.co.uk/league-t...e-seasons.html According to this we've spent 4x that of Stoke, and ~8x that of sunderland. not sure where you got your figures? |
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Here's one for Atticus and his beloved Glazers.... We've spent £690 million on servicing debts since they took over. Imagine if that was invested in the football team? |
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
A few years out of date but my main point still stands. |