Ewar Woowar must go!

I think we will get Vidal or Cuadrado(hopefully both) and Blind.

Originally Posted by Part 36 Offer

I think we will get Vidal or Cuadrado(hopefully both) and Blind.

I think we'll sign Arthur and Daley. Maybe a winger but not sure who...

Originally Posted by billynomates

3 players and a Ronald McDonald impersonator TBF

He'd be shit at that as well.

Originally Posted by atticusgrinch

Spent £100m on players this calender year already pal.

What's the net spend since they took over pal?

Is it true we've spent less / in line with (than) Stoke and Sunderland since they took over?

Did we sell the best player in the world and replace him with obertan, Owen and Valencia?

Have we really £#%&!ed £700 million on servicing debt.

£#%&!ing glazer apologist.

Originally Posted by Barksdale

What's the net spend since they took over pal?

Is it true we've spent less / in line with (than) Stoke and Sunderland since they took over?

Did we sell the best player in the world and replace him with obertan, Owen and Valencia?

Have we really £#%&!ed £700 million on servicing debt.

£#%&!ing glazer apologist.

we've actually spent more than bayern over the past 4 seasons.

Originally Posted by Lazlo Panaflex

we've actually spent more than bayern over the past 4 seasons.

Haven't required major, major surgery like us.

And if they did, they'd spend as much as it takes to get them challenging for the major trophies.

Their owners have footballing aspirations not commercial ones.

Yeah we require major surgery because we £#%&!ing wasted most of the money we have spent.

Originally Posted by andyroo

Yeah we require major surgery because we £#%&!ing wasted most of the money we have spent.

And why was that then?

Speculative punts because "there was no value in the market" as we had more important matters of paying off the PIK's.

£#%&! the football.

Originally Posted by Barksdale

And why was that then?

Speculative punts because "there was no value in the market" as we had more important matters of paying off the PIK's.

£#%&! the football.

Well, yeah, but also because Froggleson lost his £#%&!ing marbles and forgot midfield even exists.

Originally Posted by andyroo

Well, yeah, but also because Froggleson lost his £#%&!ing marbles and forgot midfield even exists.

Yep and he was the one covering for the Glazers.

Wonderful owners eh?!

Really pisses me off - we have a world class manager and if we were able to spend some of the money we self generate, we could piss this league.

Originally Posted by Barksdale

Yep and he was the one covering for the Glazers.

Wonderful owners eh?!

Really pisses me off - we have a world class manager and if we were able to spend some of the money we self generate, we could piss this league.

Now that I agree with. We need to buy bigger, but also smarter. Woodward's constant drivel about marquee signings terrifies me tbh.

Originally Posted by andyroo

Now that I agree with. We need to buy bigger, but also smarter. Woodward's constant drivel about marquee signings terrifies me tbh.

That's just to keep our "official partners" happy, one suspects.

Originally Posted by Barksdale

What's the net spend since they took over pal?

Is it true we've spent less / in line with (than) Stoke and Sunderland since they took over?

Did we sell the best player in the world and replace him with obertan, Owen and Valencia?

Have we really £#%&!ed £700 million on servicing debt.

£#%&!ing glazer apologist.

I'm not sure crying about it on the internet is going to make much difference tbh.

Originally Posted by atticusgrinch

I'm not sure crying about it on the internet is going to make much difference tbh.

Brilliant retort pal.

Hope you're enjoying the summer holidays.

Glazer apologist.

You can certainly see why Stringer Bell was the brains behind the finances.

Originally Posted by MUFC One Love

You can certainly see why Stringer Bell was the brains behind the finances.

So I'm wrong am I?

Is it true we've spent less / in line with (than) Stoke and Sunderland since they took over?

really doubt that very much to be honest.

Stoke and Sunderland outspent us in one season iirc

last 5 years net spend table
http://transferleague.co.uk/league-t...e-seasons.html

According to this we've spent 4x that of Stoke, and ~8x that of sunderland.

not sure where you got your figures?

Originally Posted by Lazlo Panaflex

really doubt that very much to be honest.

Stoke and Sunderland outspent us in one season iirc

last 5 years net spend table
http://transferleague.co.uk/league-t...e-seasons.html

According to this we've spent 4x that of Stoke, and ~8x that of sunderland.

not sure where you got your figures?

Maybe that's been affected since the mata and felliani signings. They were certainly ahead of us until recently though.

Here's one for Atticus and his beloved Glazers....

We've spent £690 million on servicing debts since they took over.

Imagine if that was invested in the football team?

Originally Posted by Barksdale

Brilliant retort pal.

Hope you're enjoying the summer holidays.

Glazer apologist.

Glazer realist. So what's your plan for getting rid of them fella?

Originally Posted by Lazlo Panaflex

really doubt that very much to be honest.

Stoke and Sunderland outspent us in one season iirc

last 5 years net spend table
http://transferleague.co.uk/league-t...e-seasons.html

According to this we've spent 4x that of Stoke, and ~8x that of sunderland.

not sure where you got your figures?

http://www.theguardian.com/football/...ns-league-exit

A few years out of date but my main point still stands.