|
|||
|
|||
scholes and giggs...
great halfs from both of them.
both doing more damage than good. scholes is playing carricks role and whilst playing it very shit, he isnt actually allowing us to make some sort of advantage out of a third man in midfield. i rather have lampard tbh as at least he knows his job as the third man in midfield. giggs is simply embarassing and touched the ball about 3 times.. but then again giggs has so man medals and appearances while scholes doesnt have an agent so they should be playing. it will take until about january for some to see how much damage those two are doing our team. |
|
||||
|
||||
They got away with it last year when Rooney and Ronnie rescued us, I have said it a few times, Giggs and Scholes were not as good as people made out last season. Scholes just wastes our 3 man midfield advantage. I would even play Rooney as the 3rd midfielder when he is fit, at least he would play more urgently and get into the box more.
|
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
scholes is out of position because our midfield is carrying him through the game at the teams and carricks expense. he is the third man in midfield. the midfielder who cant run or tackle at the moment. he should be futhest up the pitch supporting tevez and having shots from in or around the box yet he is picking the ball up and trying to pass it when carrick should really have the ball and should be passing it to him just outside the "D" http://www.utdforum.com/showpost.php...28&postcount=8 |
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
any striker on the books and eagles. some urgency and pace. id rather see us play 2 strikers at scholes expense. meaning that carrick and hargreaves play CM. we dont need the three players in midfield. its also my opinion ronaldo wouldnt have been so frustrated against portsmouth if we were not carrying scholes and giggs through the season. |
|
|||
|
|||
so carrick is playing lets say not his best, because of scholes? hargreaves seems to be doing ok, is that cos of scholes too?
scholes and hargreaves for me if you want two midfielders that should be there lose scholes and you lose a more likely goalscorer than either of the other 2 |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
What the £#%&! is a man medal? You £#%&!ing whopper |
Similar Threads for: scholes and giggs... | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New deals for Giggs and Scholes | Sloppy | Football | 24 | 18-12-2009 02:45 PM |
Giggs, Scholes and Neville | WarwickRoad | Football | 33 | 11-01-2009 10:31 PM |
I think Giggs and Scholes could be in danger... | muotmc | Football | 51 | 21-02-2008 08:05 PM |
Scholes and Giggs | El Calafate | Football | 31 | 01-02-2008 04:42 PM |
Giggs and Scholes | El Calafate | Football | 28 | 01-02-2008 04:17 PM |