Welcome Danny Ings

Originally Posted by andyroo

Signings! We want signings!

Okay, we'll sign Ings.

Very good

At least if we sign him he won't play much :

https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/dann...spieler/134294

Originally Posted by utd99

You’re throwing good money after bad here fella. I could say why specifically, but I’m becoming less inclined the longer this nonsense goes on. People can read.

You don’t need to. I am able to extract your position without needing those specifics. I hoped you would be able or willing to do the same with mine.

I think I’ve made my point and position quite clear in terms of what I’d like to see us do, not do and how Ings fits into that.. If you disagree, so be it. Perhaps we should move on, so as to not hijack the whole thread.

Originally Posted by est.1878

Very good

At least if we sign him he won't play much :

https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/dann...spieler/134294

He was born in Winchester!

Most exciting aspect of this signing will be what pure autocorrects him too

Originally Posted by Dr Stranger

You don’t need to. I am able to extract your position without needing those specifics. I hoped you would be able or willing to do the same with mine.

I think I’ve made my point and position quite clear in terms of what I’d like to see us do, not do and how Ings fits into that.. If you disagree, so be it. Perhaps we should move on, so as to not hijack the whole thread.

I don’t think you hijack a Danny Ings thread by talking about Danny Ings mate.

It’s also a little difficult to talk about the merits of a specific player and what he may add if you don’t think you’re “obliged” to talk about that player.

Originally Posted by andyroo

Signings! We want signings!

Okay, we'll sign Ings.

Ba-dum-tish!!

Originally Posted by utd99

I don’t think you hijack a Danny Ings thread by talking about Danny Ings mate.

It’s also a little difficult to talk about the merits of a specific player and what he may add if you don’t think you’re “obliged” to talk about that player.

That’s not what I said though, is it? You asked me what specifics aspects of his game I don’t think are suited to us and what we need.

I’ve made the point several times now that I don’t think an out and out centre forward (which we both agree he is, yes?) is a priority, unless it’s a ‘worldie’. so why would I need to go into the specifics of the player, when I don’t think his overall position is what we need/ a priority?

And I think we’ve hijakced the thread if it’s only us going back and forth on the same point

I don’t want Ings. Or any centre forward that isn’t a Kane-type. Is that alright? Can I give an attributes breakdown of all the other players I don’t want after I’ve had my tea - £#%&!ing starving here, mate.

Fascinating debate

Originally Posted by Sapien

Fascinating debate

oddest pair on this forum when it comes to player debate ...

Originally Posted by Bunker Buster

oddest pair on this forum when it comes to player debate ...

Worse when I reveal it’s my two logins.

Originally Posted by Dr Stranger

Worse when I reveal it’s my two logins.

Originally Posted by Bunker Buster

Just relieved I’m not scrappy tbh.

Originally Posted by Dr Stranger

Just relieved I’m not scrappy tbh.

Whoa!

Originally Posted by Sapien

Fascinating debate

State of it (them) ffs...

Originally Posted by Bunker Buster

Originally Posted by Sapien

Fascinating debate

One in the eye for those that say the brexit thread is the worst on the internet

Originally Posted by Bunker Buster

Rare something makes me proper lol. Good work, have some gr.

Everyone knows who won the debate. He hasn’t taken a beating like that since ‘pointsgate’.

Originally Posted by utd99

Rare something makes me proper lol. Good work, have some gr.

Everyone knows who won the debate. He hasn’t taken a beating like that since ‘pointsgate’.

I think the Scooby meme proves neither of us ‘won’ here

#mustwinfail

Originally Posted by Bunker Buster

Originally Posted by Bunker Buster

Brilliant memeing

Woah!

Wtf did I do

I'll take being the star of the show though