Jose Off ?

Originally Posted by lindelof

Jammy Dodger - suggest you do some research before making outlandish comments:


Fergie's season in charge 2012/13.


City (h) - lost 2-1
City (a) - won 3-2
Liverpool (h) - won 2-1
Liverpool (a) - won 2-1
Chelsea (h) - lost 1-0
Chelsea (a) - won 3-2
Arsenal (h) - won 2-1
Arsenal (a) - drew 1-1


2011/2012


Chelsea (h) - won 3-1
Chelsea (a) - drew 3-3
Arsenal (h) - won 8-2
Arsenal (a) - won 2-1
Liverpool (h) - won 2-1
Liverpool (a) - drew 1-1
City (h) - lost 6-1
City (a) - lost 1-0


2010/2011


Liverpool (h) - won 3-2
Liverpool (a) - lost 3-1
City (a) - 0-0
City (h) - won 2-1
Chelsea (a) - lost 2-1
Chelsea (h) - won 2-1
Arsenal (h) - won 1-0
Arsenal (a) - lost 1-0


Not quite the negative football you are alluding to...

Utter bullshit.

Originally Posted by Billy Redface

Oh look. Another response on Fred Tissue to an argument that nobody has made.

Nobody has said you should pick the team on the past results. Nobody has said that past results play in the upcoming fixtures.

The point, is that 25 years of games at Anfield suggest that it is never easy.

We haven't scored 3 goals there in 20 years. In that time, we've won by a margin of two twice.

Given the gulf between the teams there has been in that time, it should be easy a few times at least.

It doesn't excuse any poor performances, but it also shouldn't be ignored.

By and large, we simply do not play well at Anfield. Saturday was no exception.

the absolute hysterical reaction to Saturday's DISASTER of a result, even by the 'standards' of some on here is beyond £#%&!ing pathetic

I was at Anfield when they beat us 2-0 in 1992 to stop us winning the £#%&!ing league...now that was a £#%&!ing DISASTER...and a 0-0 draw at that shithole after we have spent the following 25 years completely dominating them in terms of trophies won I think i can just about live with

This thread wasn't about the game on Saturday though ?

Originally Posted by Bunker Buster

This thread wasn't about the game on Saturday though ?

It's about far weightier matters.

Rep.

Originally Posted by lindelof

Jammy Dodger - suggest you do some research before making outlandish comments:


Fergie's season in charge 2012/13.


City (h) - lost 2-1
City (a) - won 3-2
Liverpool (h) - won 2-1
Liverpool (a) - won 2-1
Chelsea (h) - lost 1-0
Chelsea (a) - won 3-2
Arsenal (h) - won 2-1
Arsenal (a) - drew 1-1


2011/2012


Chelsea (h) - won 3-1
Chelsea (a) - drew 3-3
Arsenal (h) - won 8-2
Arsenal (a) - won 2-1
Liverpool (h) - won 2-1
Liverpool (a) - drew 1-1
City (h) - lost 6-1
City (a) - lost 1-0


2010/2011


Liverpool (h) - won 3-2
Liverpool (a) - lost 3-1
City (a) - 0-0
City (h) - won 2-1
Chelsea (a) - lost 2-1
Chelsea (h) - won 2-1
Arsenal (h) - won 1-0
Arsenal (a) - lost 1-0


Not quite the negative football you are alluding to...

The City game 2011-12 you know the one 0 shots on target he should have been sacked that night

If he does not win the league then he will not be here medium term never mind long term. And that goes both ways, I can not see him wanting to hang around nor the club wanting him to pay him huge money just to compete.....

Originally Posted by Jammy Dodger

Utter bullshit.

What are? The results?

It's fact you daft plum. I didn't just make the results up...

Originally Posted by Bunker Buster

This thread wasn't about the game on Saturday though ?

Very true.

Let's get back on the subject of Jose and his awful son.

Originally Posted by Cream

10.05 request made by Saffers.

X2 reps since then... (call went out...?)
X1 bad rep from Saffers.

That makes x1 (green? red?) received when you made the original claim.

Saffers was right.

I'm often right tbf.

Need a full print screen from bb or he will go down as the guy who lied about getting good rep.

Originally Posted by saffers

I'm often right tbf.

Need a full print screen from bb or he will go down as the guy who lied about getting good rep.

Fuming he's put you in this position tbh.

Originally Posted by Cream

Fuming he's put you in this position tbh.

Bunks self owned. I can't do much more. The truth is clear anyway.

3 green 2 red.

Saffers and the oddball utd99

Good rep will stay private

Originally Posted by Bunker Buster

3 green 2 red.

Saffers and the oddball utd99

Good rep will stay private

Quite right too. The seal of the green rep is sacrosanct.

Originally Posted by Bunker Buster

3 green 2 red.

Saffers and the oddball utd99

Good rep will stay private

We know this is unconfirmed until you do another screenshot.

But can confirm one thing, BB did not respond to my neg rep with neg rep of his own. That is very classy pal.

Originally Posted by n48

Good riddance after yesterday's farce.

Maybe redemption for Moyes? #unfinishedbusiness

Originally Posted by saffers

We know this is unconfirmed until you do another screenshot.

But can confirm one thing, BB did not respond to my neg rep with neg rep of his own. That is very classy pal.

Not my style mate, I use the function for posts I don't agree with it.



I'm on holiday, so enjoy your evening....

Originally Posted by saffers

We know this is unconfirmed until you do another screenshot.

But can confirm one thing, BB did not respond to my neg rep with neg rep of his own. That is very classy pal.

Classy fella.

Just a bit of a bare faced liar.

Originally Posted by currycantona

I don't think that poster was being serious, pal.

Originally Posted by Cream

Classy fella.

Just a bit of a bare faced liar.

jose journo mate's podcast today

https://audioboom.com/posts/6408796-...-ugly-break-up