United Forum
Go Back   United Forum > Manchester United > Football
Closed Thread
 
Unread 10-05-2016, 09:33 AM
morgan
 
Default Team for Wham

CBA to type mine out but perhaps you can. Martial out, so Eric help us

Same side as Norwich, except Blind in for Darmian and Rashers back in... I'd drop Memphis. Don't trust him in a game like this at the moment, he'll do something stupid (or multiple stupid things)
 
Unread 10-05-2016, 09:33 AM
Sizlack
 
Default

Iam your man
 
Unread 10-05-2016, 09:35 AM
ZiggyStardust
 
Default

Martial isn't definitely out

He faces a late fitness test

By god do we need him for this game
 
Unread 10-05-2016, 09:42 AM
Denis Irwell
 
Default

Dave
Valencia
Smalling
Blind
Cbj
Schneid
Carrick
Herreroh
Lingard
Rashers
Rooney

Did cross my mind to pick Rojo for his height and play Young in front of him cos he's shit at defending but he's shit at heading anyway so nothing gained.

Hope Martial is OK obv.
 
Unread 10-05-2016, 10:27 AM
jem
 
Default

de gea

valencia - smalling - blind - rojo

schneidi - carrick - timmeh fm

hererra

rooney - martial
 
Unread 10-05-2016, 10:45 AM
dunk
 
Default

DdG
Valencia
Blind
Smalling
CBJ
Schneiderlin
Sanches
Rooney
Martial
Lingard
Rashers
 
Unread 10-05-2016, 11:03 AM
dragflick
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jem
de gea

valencia - smalling - blind - rojo

schneidi - carrick - timmeh fm

hererra

rooney - martial
 
Unread 10-05-2016, 11:08 AM
Sizlack
 
Default

We will REALLY REALLY miss Felliani tonight. Andy Carrol will bully us up down and all around.
 
Unread 10-05-2016, 11:14 AM
jem
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sizlack
Andy Carrol will bully us up down and all around.
like he did in the cup?
 
Unread 10-05-2016, 11:16 AM
General Woundwort
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sizlack
We will REALLY REALLY miss Felliani tonight.
We won't.
 
Unread 10-05-2016, 11:21 AM
waynes ear's
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jem
de gea

valencia - smalling - blind - rojo

schneidi - carrick - timmeh fm

hererra

rooney - martial
given that Martial is injured, i'll post this again

 
Unread 10-05-2016, 11:22 AM
jem
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dragflick


Quote:
Originally Posted by waynes ear's
given that Martial is injured, i'll post this again

maybe ziggy could post his post again too.

if martial is out, then rashford, lingard, mata, young or memphis disappointment.
 
Unread 10-05-2016, 11:34 AM
dragflick
 
Default

jem, genuine question- why the @#%&!ing £#%&!ing hell would you leave Rashford out of your side?
 
Unread 10-05-2016, 11:41 AM
jem
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dragflick
jem, genuine question- why the @#%&!ing £#%&!ing hell would you leave Rashford out of your side?
well.... his form hasn't been so good recently, he hasn't been getting chances and rooney is fit. and I like the idea of having rashford on the bench more than I like the idea of having rooney on the bench. lingard and rashford would probably work ok, too. the import thing is that the team has balance. so I wouldn't play martial, rashford, mata and lingard as a front four, with a right back on the bench.
 
Unread 10-05-2016, 11:44 AM
dragflick
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jem
well.... his form hasn't been so good recently, he hasn't been getting chances and rooney is fit. and I like the idea of having rashford on the bench more than I like the idea of having rooney on the bench. lingard and rashford would probably work ok, too. the import thing is that the team has balance. so I wouldn't play martial, rashford, mata and lingard as a front four, with a right back on the bench.
Disagree massively. We need Rashford and his pace/threat.

https://twitter.com/MUFCScoop/status/720330351453872128
 
Unread 10-05-2016, 11:52 AM
jem
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dragflick
Disagree massively. We need Rashford and his pace/threat.

https://twitter.com/MUFCScoop/status/720330351453872128
sure, it was a good goal. he has scored good goals. but if you play rashford and martial because they have pace, you are looking to bring on someone with no pace, which is not a good option. I have no problem with rashford as a player. I will not cry if we start rashford and martial (although king louis will then probably play rooney in midfield). if martial is injured, I would certainly start rashford. as I said, it's not about players so much as balance... in the team and on the bench.
 
Unread 10-05-2016, 11:53 AM
dragflick
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jem
sure, it was a good goal. he has scored good goals. but if you play rashford and martial because they have pace, you are looking to bring on someone with no pace, which is not a good option. I have no problem with rashford as a player. I will not cry if we start rashford and martial (although king louis will then probably play rooney in midfield). if martial is injured, I would certainly start rashford. as I said, it's not about players so much as balance... in the team and on the bench.
Absolute jibberish worrying about people to bring on. Yeah, leave our quick players out incase we have to bring one on

Even for you, that is absolute %@#$&!s.
 
Unread 10-05-2016, 12:00 PM
jem
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dragflick
Absolute jibberish worrying about people to bring on. Yeah, leave our quick players out incase we have to bring one on

Even for you, that is absolute %@#$&!s.
it's a factor; it is not the only factor. as I said originally, rashford has not been getting chances and rooney is a smart player. you think england will take rashford instead of rooney? even king louis expects rashford to be inconsistent. if you are accusing someone of jibberish and %@#$&!s for thinking maybe rooney should play up front instead of rashford, you are picking a stupid fight over which to act like a dog with a bone. martial is a question. I really wouldn't mind if we started with martial and rashford up front, but I do not want to overload with attacking players at the expense of the midfield, so choices have to be made.
 
Unread 10-05-2016, 12:06 PM
Sizlack
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jem
like he did in the cup?
Felliani played then Jemima love xx Kept Carroll in his pocket and scored the winner hth
 
Unread 10-05-2016, 12:07 PM
Sapien
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jem
it's a factor; it is not the only factor. as I said originally, rashford has not been getting chances and rooney is a smart player. you think england will take rashford instead of rooney? even king louis expects rashford to be inconsistent. if you are accusing someone of jibberish and %@#$&!s for thinking maybe rooney should play up front instead of rashford, you are picking a stupid fight over which to act like a dog with a bone. martial is a question. I really wouldn't mind if we started with martial and rashford up front, but I do not want to overload with attacking players at the expense of the midfield, so choices have to be made.
Play Rashford in central midfield. Sorted.
Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Similar Threads for: Team for Wham
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wham v Spuds Time For Heroes Football 234 26-02-2013 02:08 PM
Big Sam to Wham Fuzzy Dunlop Football 20 02-06-2011 07:41 AM
Vermin v. Wham taff Football 48 21-04-2010 09:47 PM
Arsenal v Wham Switching Off Football 112 20-03-2010 08:47 PM
chelsea - wham borsuk Football 27 01-12-2007 03:09 PM
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21 PM.
Copyright ©2006 - 2024 utdforum.com. This site is in no way affiliated to Manchester United Football Club.