Tommorows Mail

Originally Posted by f.l.a.t.s

http://www.utdforum.com/showthread.php?t=6745


For my point ...look in the thread above...its not who is good and bad but who will play/fit together on the pitch.

I dont see it....i might be wrong ...i often do get it wrong you know.

To be fair,theres some good points being brought across on both sides.Obviously
its hard to imagine where such a player would fit in,given our current team,but i have no doubt that Fergie has an idea,which is good enough for me.The lad undoubtedly a talented footballer,and one who,i have no doubt,will improve our side considerably.

It's his versatility as well as his quality that sets his value to United I'd say.

Nicky Butt was a great player to have in the team - not scared to sort out the opposition £#%&!wit and could score a goal as well. Phil Neville had the versatility of Hargreaves but not really the quality.

Got no idea how the price tag is reached, but just think that Hargreaves would be a top addition to the squad.

hargreaves > old butt > neville p > new butt > fletcher.

%@#$&!s to playing him in other positions! As Sven proved, he is best in Centre Midfield.

Hargreaves' technical ability and experience > Nolan, Barton, Cahill.

Case Closed.