|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
It would have taken 10 seconds to see a replay and know scholes’ goal was onside, if that. The times var is used to change a decision should be quite rare. There haven’t been that many mental decisions over the years that are a clear injustice. Maradonna and the France/ireland playoff are the types of thing var should be for. |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Managers who constantly whine about officials have to suck this up now. They've been asking for it for years. |
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Besides, if you start using it for marginal offsides then it creates all kind of issues which mean those situations will no longer average out. Offside goals that we’re initially thought onside will be ruled out, but when a player is running through on goal and incorrectly given offside, play is stopped and the chance denied. |
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
If used it should be for extremely tight calls to help the referee make a decision. The evening itself out thing is a red herring. |
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Scholes goal should have stood against Porto. Maradonna’s goal should have been disallowed. The French goal against Ireland shouldn’t have stood. The ref and linesmen shouldn’t have made such poor decisions in situations that weren’t close. But they did. And those injustices would have been sorted before the celebrations were finished rather than taking 10 minutes to decide on a marginal decision which happen 10 times a game. It doesn’t matter if someone is a gnat’s %@#$&! onside or offside. It’s luck of the call for one particular outcome where the long term outcome averages out as the number of calls increase. It’s neutral. Quote:
|
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
But there's no connection between the impact of a decision and how poor a decision is. The cost is great? So we only to use it in circumstances we deem costly? And where is the line between what is a big error and what is a normal error? We often don't know the impact of decisions until later. The level of injustice is massively subjective. We either use it for specific categories of decisions or we don't. Personally, I don't like it. Very few calls are entirely objective and a matter of fact. Goal line, offside, ok. Anything else, not for me. And this system they seem to have where they are checking goals to make sure nothing is wrong before awarding them is the tipping point for me. A definite no. I'll take being royally screwed over rather than never being able to enjoy a goal in the moment again. We've been watching football for 100 years knowing that luck or a bad decision can cost something. Yet we all come back and watch. It's a problem that doesn't need rectifying imo. |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
But then, I can't see why. It would remove them from the decision making process & they could be 'perfect'. |
Similar Threads for: Video refereeing to be trialed in next years FA Cup | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Premier League refereeing chiefs reject Jurgen Klopp and Ole Gunnar Solskjaer's complaints | fred tissue | Football Auto-Threads | 0 | 23-08-2021 04:00 PM |
Southampton request that Mike Dean and Lee Mason are BANNED from refereeing their matches | fred tissue | Football Auto-Threads | 0 | 03-02-2021 10:40 AM |
Refereeing | redhegemony | Football | 34 | 05-12-2016 04:56 PM |
*Official* Chelsea v United Match Thread - Teams & Piss poor refereeing inside | Sparky*** | Manchester United Match Thread Archive | 1012 | 06-02-2012 11:57 PM |
*Official* Arsenal v United Match Thread - Teams & Piss poor refereeing inside | Sparky*** | Manchester United Match Thread Archive | 941 | 24-01-2012 01:41 AM |