United and Real both bid >£16mill for Valencia

We've bid 16+ million for Valencia along with Madrid.

Originally Posted by Rhodzy

We've bid 16+ million for Valencia along with Madrid.

do we get their ground as well ?

on SSN now

He'll sign for us then, you would have thought.

ffs

fergies record in the transfer market has been quite poor of late.

Better than Nani and Park ? Haven't seen too much of him.

http://www.utdforum.com/forum/showpo...7&postcount=79

i quite like him, proper direct winger, but he prefers to play on the right and we desperately someone for the left imo.

Originally Posted by marlo

ffs

fergies record in the transfer market has been quite poor of late.

Whats wrong with you?Hes black isnt he?

Originally Posted by united1878

Better than Nani and Park ? Haven't seen too much of him.

'Oooh, can of worms......."

He'll go Madrid.

fergie shouldnt be given money to spend if he is going to continue to recent poor transfer dealings.

in the last year

berbatov = 30m
de laet = 4m
tosic and ljajic = 14m

and now valencia 16m

thats £64m.

added to the fact hargreaves cost 17m and has no return date.

Originally Posted by marlo

ffs

fergies record in the transfer market has been quite poor of late.

Who?

Nani?

Originally Posted by marlo

fergie shouldnt be given money to spend if he is going to continue to recent poor transfer dealings.

in the last year

berbatov = 30m
de laet = 4m
tosic and ljajic = 14m

and now valencia 16m

thats £64m.

added to the fact hargreaves cost 17m and has no return date.

Yep, Tosic and Lkalic are complete flops.

I doubt we paid 4m for De Laet, wasn't he just bought so Antwerp could get good money for him?

Berbatov isn't a flop, let's see how he does next season before we judge.

If you wanna talk bad signings, let's discuss Nani...

let's give tosic and ljajic a chance shall we ? need a year or two before we can judge.

Originally Posted by MUFC One Love

Yep, Tosic and Lkalic are complete flops.

I doubt we paid 4m for De Laet, wasn't he just bought so Antwerp could get good money for him?

Berbatov isn't a flop, let's see how he does next season before we judge.

If you wanna talk bad signings, let's discuss Nani...

are we turning into arsenal buying these players for the future.

berbatov is a flop. he is shit.

Originally Posted by MUFC One Love

Yep, Tosic and Lkalic are complete flops.

I doubt we paid 4m for De Laet, wasn't he just bought so Antwerp could get good money for him?

Berbatov isn't a flop, let's see how he does next season before we judge.

If you wanna talk bad signings, let's discuss Nani...

14 goals and 16 or so assists.

The Berba-hate has gone into delirious overdrive since his semi final penalty

Originally Posted by marlo

fergie shouldnt be given money to spend if he is going to continue to recent poor transfer dealings.

in the last year

berbatov = 30m
de laet = 4m
tosic and ljajic = 14m

and now valencia 16m

thats £64m.

added to the fact hargreaves cost 17m and has no return date.

but the old man will still balance the books. Ronaldo for £12m and sell for £75m . Net loss on bad signings £1m

edit - bad signings in your book I should add

no United fan would say Ferguson has assembled a poor squad

we have a top class squad, good enough in fact for a period of success unparallelled in United's entire history

i think he would be good, adds something different. he bullied brazils midfield the other month when he played in the centre, got more to his game than just running down the wing

Originally Posted by Sloane

i think he would be good, adds something different. he bullied brazils midfield the other month when he played in the centre, got more to his game than just running down the wing

Agree with that.