Harry Manager Of The Year

Originally Posted by Ginners

ffs

mao = egg on face

Ginners blatantly frothing at the mouth in defence of his beloved spuds


Where did I say net?

OUTLAY is what I said isn't it?

Your desperation to defend spurs is clouding your ability to understand basic english

Originally Posted by Mao's Favourite Starling

Ginners blatantly frothing at the mouth in defence of his beloved spuds


Where did I say net?

OUTLAY is what I said isn't it?

Your desperation to defend spurs is clouding your ability to understand basic english

and outlay is compeltely irrelevant to the point you tried to make to grimson.

apologise to both of us and ill let it slide.

Originally Posted by Ginners

and outlay is compeltely irrelevant to the point you tried to make to grimson.

apologise to both of us and ill let it slide.

true

Im not apologising though , as the money for the players going out came from somewhere as they werent all academy graduates

i.e their owner who is one of the richest according to same radio 5 geezer

outlay isn't irrelevant. having the ability to bring in large numbers of players, give them a go and move them on isn't something all clubs can do. they have to operate on a one-in, one-out basis. not to mention wage costs etc.

if they do the double, then it's ancelotti. easily.

Triffic dizzishon

Originally Posted by Mao's Favourite Starling

No, you said they didn't have a sugar daddy and they do

Originally Posted by Mao's Favourite Starling

true

Im not apologising though , as the money for the players going out came from somewhere as they werent all academy graduates

i.e their owner who is one of the richest according to same radio 5 geezer

It doesn't matter how rich the owner is. He isn't a 'sugar daddy' unless he's paying for transfer fees and wages with HIS OWN MONEY. Spurs do not have one of those. Only Chelsea and City do. Spurs have had to sell players, ofttimes their best players (Berbs, Keane, Defoe).