Champs league 26/10

Originally Posted by Dasilvatwins

Whilst this is true sometimes , help me out here, it was offside? There’s no debate to it wasn’t. Kane was Infront of the ball when it was passed

Are people having a go at it for being correct or because it took 3 mins?

This isn't rugby pal, you can be in front of the ball and not be offside...

Do you mean 'the man'...

Originally Posted by Dasilvatwins

Whilst this is true sometimes , help me out here, it was offside? There’s no debate to it wasn’t. Kane was Infront of the ball when it was passed

Are people having a go at it for being correct or because it took 3 mins?

The ball actually went backwards though. He was offside when the ball hit the Sporting player inadvertently and it moved towards the goal.

Pretty sure years ago, it didn't matter if it was inadvertent or not, if it was played by the opposition player you weren't offside.

By the rules, it was the correct decision.

https://twitter.com/AndyHa_/status/1585534970839318530?s=20&t=w4as2fNIjJ-Nbhqfhkx3Ow

Originally Posted by Ethers

https://twitter.com/AndyHa_/status/1...jJ-Nbhqfhkx3Ow

And in the end it was a camera that ruined this berks fun

Originally Posted by Coracao

The ball actually went backwards though. He was offside when the ball hit the Sporting player inadvertently and it moved towards the goal.

Pretty sure years ago, it didn't matter if it was inadvertent or not, if it was played by the opposition player you weren't offside.

By the rules, it was the correct decision.

It’s irrelevant that the ball went backwards, it’s not in the rules. He was ahead of the ball when it was headed by the spurs player, that’s why it was offside

https://youtu.be/47JWOsBGYvw

They need to sort out the offside and handball rules.

Originally Posted by Ethers

It’s irrelevant that the ball went backwards, it’s not in the rules. He was ahead of the ball when it was headed by the spurs player, that’s why it was offside

Pretty sure I said it was the correct decision

I was explaining it in the context of before the rule changes, it would have stood.

the rules are £#%&!ing stupid, that should never have been chalked off.

Absolutely love VAR when we're not involved ......

The city spurs one was incredible...

Originally Posted by Ethers

https://twitter.com/AndyHa_/status/1...jJ-Nbhqfhkx3Ow

50 secs in.

*insert Ralphie Wiggum gif here*

https://twitter.com/Futball_Karim/status/1585376274255876096?s=20&t=2oGY7wKKZ0Ri-c0a136KnQ

Originally Posted by Zorg

https://twitter.com/Futball_Karim/st...Z0Ri-c0a136KnQ

With this one I'm wondering what would have happened if the rebound had gone in as the ref doesn't blow until it goes out of play. The pelanty was awarded after the game had finished by VAR so technically as soon as the missed the ref should have blown no?

Originally Posted by Zorg

https://twitter.com/Futball_Karim/st...Z0Ri-c0a136KnQ

Can only imagine the verbals being given to Carrasco there at the end as he inadvertently spanners the follow up over the bar from a yard out

Originally Posted by Baron

Can only imagine the verbals being given to Carrasco there at the end as he inadvertently spanners the follow up over the bar from a yard out

Another angle

https://twitter.com/buuuutttt/status/1585536351352619009?s=20&t=2oGY7wKKZ0Ri-c0a136KnQ

Originally Posted by Zorg

Another angle

https://twitter.com/buuuutttt/status...Z0Ri-c0a136KnQ

£#%&!ing amazing

Can’t get enough of these. Absolute cretins

https://twitter.com/benspurs21/status/1585432806603325441?s=20&t=d7uSSvCM3sGgyNSR000P0g

https://twitter.com/Funwithflares/status/1585526792797954049?s=20&t=d7uSSvCM3sGgyNSR000P0g

Originally Posted by Ethers

Can’t get enough of these. Absolute cretins

https://twitter.com/benspurs21/statu...3sGgyNSR000P0g

https://twitter.com/Funwithflares/st...3sGgyNSR000P0g

The more I see, the less I feel any sympathy

Look at me @#%&!s