|
||||
|
||||
the glazers have done nothing but good
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/spo...cle1779724.ece
and there, tucked away, is this little comment... Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
£#%&! that, not doing anything to completely £#%&! up the club on the football side of things doesn't validate what they've done over the past two years.
I've been on the "wait and see" side of things but I will be irritated to see them celebrating the league title on Sunday. Fact is, they've done about as much as me to help with this league campaign. |
|
||||
|
||||
diploma in £#%&!wittery.
i can't believe your whole argument re: funds comes down to 'we tried to hargreaves for 60 squadgillion pounds!!!!!111!!!11!!11!!!1.12.13o31' that article aside, there are several quotes from several people about the fact we had no money. even sennas agent came out and said the deal fell through because we couldn't afford his wages. do you not think there's a slight, just a slight chance that it was a well constructed smoke screen? "we would buy senna but um, we're really doing our bestest to buy hargreaves. honest." and i only ever heard that out of gills mouth. someone should drag up that thread about glazers PR i wrote a while back, even she said that while negotiations were 'ongoing' and we were 'doing our best', the reason they'd dragged out was over money - but not that we wouldn't pay 20 million, more the fact we wouldn't pay over a much lower figure. anyway i'm not gonna argue the point because we always go round in circles. have a good weekend |
|
|||
|
|||
lets be fair. there is no proof that the article is true and fergie wanted berbatov but the club couldn't afford him, and there is no proof that united intended to actually buy hargreaves for 20m.
only the glazers know how much we had to spend, although the fact the net spend turned out to be 0 indicates it was not a lot. |
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Most things had to be transparent and declared. With the Glazers £#%&! only knows what is going on behind the scenes. |
|
||||
|
||||
look . i'm no glazer apologist, but this berbatov thing. if its true that the ruud deal wasn't certain, wouldn't it be fair enough of our owners(whoever they were) to say...hang on, we've got saha, oli and smith as well as van nistelroy until he's sold...you've got to sell one before you buy another...spurs took advantage and nipped in..it happens sometimes
|
|
|||
|
|||
United bid £22 million on Hargreaves and £8 million on Bale last January, yet bids werent accepted.
They had to sell ruud before thet bought a forward, if they would have bought before, ruuds value would have been even less. the Ruud sale turned into a farce, with him attending pre-season training much to Fergusons annoyance. |
|
||||
|
||||
The crooks who run football don't give a £#%&! about supporters. They don't care about history and tradition. They don't care that clubs were originally created to be part of their communities (hence the term 'club'). They don't care that these clubs then became part of the fabric of people's lives. They don't care that supporters are the lifeblood of clubs. They don't care that future generations may well not be able to go to matches as its too expensive for families now.
They only want customers, and they only care about money. It amazes me there are still people left who can't see this. |
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
Similar Threads for: the glazers have done nothing but good | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Erik ten Hag believes Manchester United sale by Glazers would be good | fred tissue | Football Auto-Threads | 0 | 21-12-2022 04:40 PM |
Nigel James is determined to produce good people as well as good players | fred tissue | Football Auto-Threads | 0 | 20-05-2021 11:20 AM |
The Glazers. | ziggyman17 | Football | 27 | 04-10-2019 06:47 AM |
The Glazers | Jack Duckworth | Football | 99 | 09-07-2008 06:00 PM |
You have to admit, with hindsight, the Glazers have been good for United. | antonin jablonsky | Football | 40 | 10-10-2007 04:53 PM |