Our transfer business

"He's ruining our young players with all his signings"

*Quiet transfer window*

"Buy more players!"

Originally Posted by Switching Off

"He's ruining our young players with all his signings"

*Quiet transfer window*

"Buy more players!"

Let's be honest, we don't have any youth players who are good enough.

I think we would be happy to buy 'young' players, however...

Originally Posted by Switching Off

"He's ruining our young players with all his signings"

*Quiet transfer window*

"Buy more players!"

You’d have a point if we could reasonably expect some of the young players to get decent minutes.

His recent comments suggest that isn’t going to happen.

Originally Posted by Switching Off

"He's ruining our young players with all his signings"

*Quiet transfer window*

"Buy more players!"

draggers please son tell us something good

Originally Posted by puressence

draggers please son tell us something good

here you go

All roads lead back to the Glazers.. Under investment for years and years has put the club in the state it is today.. 600 million of the clubs money spent on transfers in their ownership equals 50 odd million spent on average in 13yrs here.. Yet the gimps have burned through alot more money on interest and handouts to themselves..

Originally Posted by ziggyman17

All roads lead back to the Glazers.. Under investment for years and years has put the club in the state it is today.. 600 million of the clubs money spent on transfers in their ownership equals 50 odd million spent on average in 13yrs here.. Yet the gimps have burned through alot more money on interest and handouts to themselves..

That old excuse

Fergie never had a problem with it ? In fact won a European cup

Originally Posted by plopborsky

That old excuse

Fergie never had a problem with it ? In fact won a European cup

The team fergie won a european cup with was already in place before the gimps took over.. Hargreaves was the only signing of big money to start the final, Tevez was a loanee and Van der Sar signed for peanuts..

Originally Posted by ziggyman17

The team fergie won a european cup with was already in place before the gimps took over.. Hargreaves was the only signing of big money to start the final, Tevez was a loanee and Van der Sar signed for peanuts..

Anderson, Nani and Carrick after the yanks took over but again its easy to say that they have not backed the managers.

Originally Posted by plopborsky

You are flip flopping pal the other post was about how we had our best points total since fergie and it was progress etc

City are not that £#%&!ing good. They just have a much better manager.

Then they must have a much better manager than Spurs and Liverpool.

So either we hire a manager better than the best manager in the premier league (possibly world) or.... we keep the second best and outspend them.

Personally, I think if you give Pep and Mou-Mou the same amount of resources, it's a coin toss as to who ends up winning the most titles. Pep starting off with better players and going on to spend more is a recipe for disaster.

That's a club issue, not a managerial one.

Originally Posted by Cream

Then they must have a much better manager than Spurs and Liverpool.

So either we hire a manager better than the best manager in the premier league (possibly world) or.... we keep the second best and outspend them.

Personally, I think if you give Pep and Mou-Mou the same amount of resources, it's a coin toss as to who ends up winning the most titles. Pep starting off with better players and going on to spend more is a recipe for disaster.

That's a club issue, not a managerial one.

making out that Jose has had no money to spend since he came here

the £#%&!er has spent close to 300mil dont make out that poor old Jose has not had the backing from the club.

Jose has hardly sold any of the £#%&!ing dross left from LVG

Originally Posted by plopborsky

making out that Jose has had no money to spend since he came here

the £#%&!er has spent close to 300mil dont make out that poor old Jose has not had the backing from the club.

Jose has hardly sold any of the £#%&!ing dross left from LVG

Everton are dropping 50 mil on players nowadays mate. Liverpool just dropped 75m on a centre back and 65m on a £#%&!ing goalkeeper.

300m? That's £#%&!ing chicken feed where United are concerned, especially given our supposed lofty ambitions.

City have spent 500m on a squad that was better than ours to begin with anyway.

How does £400m sound?

Binned off one of his signings who he couldn't get a run of games out of in 18 months for Sanchez who has stunk the place out and may well push out one of the best young players in football.

Originally Posted by Buck

How does £400m sound?

Binned off one of his signings who he couldn't get a run of games out of in 18 months for Sanchez who has stunk the place out and may well push out one of the best young players in football.

Like a number you've pulled out of your arse?

Because the actual number is 365m (i'm including Fred and Dalot as well)

Originally Posted by Sparky***

Everton are dropping 50 mil on players nowadays mate. Liverpool just dropped 75m on a centre back and 65m on a £#%&!ing goalkeeper.

300m? That's £#%&!ing chicken feed where United are concerned, especially given our supposed lofty ambitions.

City have spent 500m on a squad that was better than ours to begin with anyway.

city had a huge turn over of players last summer(13 left) so the squad was not better than ours we decided to keep our shit and not move it on.

Originally Posted by plopborsky

city had a huge turn over of players last summer(13 left) so the squad was not better than ours we decided to keep our shit and not move it on.

Yes it was. When both managers took their respective jobs in 2016, City were starting with a far better squad than United were, with better players.

Originally Posted by Sparky***

Like a number you've pulled out of your arse?

Because the actual number is 365m (i'm including Fred and Dalot as well)

300m? That's £#%&!ing chicken feed where United are concerned, especially given our supposed lofty ambitions.

365m is closer to 400m than 300m so I win.

Originally Posted by Sparky***

Yes it was. When both managers took their respective jobs in 2016, City were starting with a far better squad than United were, with better players.

far better being 9 points?

Originally Posted by plopborsky

far better being 9 points?

No far better being having better players