Tevez cost 47million

so says The Times.

Money don't matter to them, so it doesn't matter but still.....

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/spo...cle6831582.ece

Even funnier then when the little tart starts agitating for a move in a couple of seasons.

I can only say

Seriously

I liked him, but damn!!

Nobody else anywhere would have paid anywhere near that kind of money what on earth are they doing?. I know it doesn't really matter to them but it's just a ridiculous, Ridsdale-esque transfer decision.

Funny how he is "injured" for the derby.

Spineless little @#%&!.

Originally Posted by koppas

Funny how he is "injured" for the derby.

Spineless little @#%&!.

Yep, agreed. Knows the reception he's going to get from reds no doubt, plus it gives the bitters an excuse should they lose the game. I'd never have paid that for him anyway tbh.

probably is £47 mil with wages on a 5 year contract.....

that is what the divs, are paying in 3 lumps


ycnmiu 4932832994843294829

oh dear

:shakehead:

On down the page

i have been frantically trying to delete it

Another £3.5 million will be paid if City win the Champions League while Tévez is at the club.

So its 43.5 million.

Titanic amount of money that

Record Tevez deal denied

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,195...553794,00.html

All kinds of dodgy money have changed hands there, probably started changing hands about 12 months ago too.

Expect there to be some serious digging into this transfer.

the owners of city honestly do not care, how much player cost.

Originally Posted by marlo

the owners of city honestly do not care, how much player cost.

If I was religious I would pray for some rich arabs to take over United.

The club has already sold its soul ages ago, rather be owned by rich Arabs than a snidey fat ginger @#%&! who hasn't even said one word since taking over.

Imagine Sir Alex having £200m to spend in a transfer window? We could get quite a lot of Tosic's for that.