Jason Wilcox

Originally Posted by marlo

Wasn’t the narrative that southampton were helping city with their money laundering by buying city academy players?
even though it made sense after the DOF used to be at city?

If wilcox joins and we sign some city academy players would that be the case as well?

This is why i say someone if you lot are like women. Just bitch and moan about absolutely anything without a hint of objectivity or rationale.

https://www.utdforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=334138

This thread is amazing.

No need for the sexism.

Originally Posted by larry

personally i think the skepticism regarding the legitimacy of the fees city are receiving for their academy players is valid. this is a club with 105 charges pending who have no respect for rules. they know money can buy them everything and buy them out of everything.

So you think Southampton are risking everything to help Man City cheat and cook their books?

Originally Posted by Dasilvatwins

No need for the sexism.

it’s not sexism in my opinion and even if it was, so what…

tbh I’ve always though you were a woman. You don’t post or reason things like a man. You also lack accountability ….how many years no claims do you have out of interest?

Originally Posted by marlo

So you think Southampton are risking everything to help Man City cheat and cook their books?

don't be naive. a structure with unlimited funds will have their ways of doing this. it's off the books. it's untraceable (for now)

Originally Posted by marlo

tbh I’ve always though you were a woman. You don’t post or reason things like a man. You also lack accountability ….how many years no claims do you have out of interest?

she's the only poster on here on my ignore list. nothing against her at all, i just noticed very early on during my time here her tendency to post very, very long posts that bored me to tears and lacked any insight. i have ocd and have to read every post so had no other option.

Originally Posted by larry

she's the only poster on here on my ignore list. nothing against her at all, i just noticed very early on during my time here her tendency to post very, very long posts that bored me to tears and lacked any insight. i have ocd and have to read every post so had no other option.

even the “no need for sexism” reply was typical woman’s post. Just had to say something.

Originally Posted by marlo

So you think Southampton are risking everything to help Man City cheat and cook their books?



it’s not sexism in my opinion and even if it was, so what…

tbh I’ve always though you were a woman. You don’t post or reason things like a man. You also lack accountability ….how many years no claims do you have out of interest?

Even if it was so what… armchair has rules for #@&%!s like you for a reason.

Originally Posted by Dasilvatwins

Even if it was so what… armchair has rules for #@&%!s like you for a reason.

what are the rules then ?

and what rules have I broken??

I hope this isn't you flirting with me.....please stop.

Originally Posted by Dasilvatwins

Even if it was so what… armchair has rules for #@&%!s like you for a reason.

Is it true what they’re saying though, dasilvatwins? Do you lack accountability?

Originally Posted by marlo

even the “no need for sexism” reply was typical woman’s post. Just had to say something.

Why do you think sexism is Ok?

You think you are saying things about others here, Marlo, but you are generally saying so much more about yourself.

Originally Posted by marlo

What does that even mean?

I know why I’m asking you this….

Everything alright pal?

Originally Posted by marlo

i hope this isn't you flirting with me.....

😁

This marlo is quite amusing.

Originally Posted by RedNick80

Why do you think sexism is Ok?

You think you are saying things about others here, Marlo, but you are generally saying so much more about yourself.

how am i being sexist?

And furthermore this has nothing to do with you. She isn’t going to £#%&! you mate

Originally Posted by marlo

how am i being sexist?

And furthermore this has nothing to do with you. She isn’t going to £#%&! you mate

She's no newsy etc

Originally Posted by marlo

how am i being sexist?

And furthermore this has nothing to do with you. She isn’t going to £#%&! you mate

Don’t speak too soon, it’s just usually takes a few pm’s.

Wilcox, Benni McCarthy. Which ex-Blackburn nobody would you like to see join our ranks next?

Jeff Kenna or Morten Gamst Peterson for me.

Graham Fenton for me.

Originally Posted by Stickman

Graham Fenton for me.

Doubt it, heard he's struggling with a drug addiction.


Graham Fenton-ill.

Originally Posted by marlo

how am i being sexist?

And furthermore this has nothing to do with you. She isn’t going to £#%&! you mate

It's just pure ignorance in your case. I suspect Armers gives you a long leash because you drive traffic, but if there was any equivalence you'd have been binned off long ago.

& DST was my FOTY so if there was a chance I'm well up on the groundwork, thanks.

Originally Posted by RedNick80

It's just pure ignorance in your case. I suspect Armers gives you a long leash because you drive traffic, but if there was any equivalence you'd have been binned off long ago.

& DST was my FOTY so if there was a chance I'm well up on the groundwork, thanks.

Just put him on ignore and stay on topic. I searched through the other feminist's posts and found plenty of occasions where he calls people a bitch and @#%&!. I'm sure you've never used gendered language as an insult on here, though.

STAY ON THIS TOPIC: "Jason Wilcox"

Originally Posted by armchair

Just put him on ignore and stay on topic. I searched through the other feminist's posts and found plenty of occasions where he calls people a bitch and @#%&!. I'm sure you've never used gendered language as an insult on here, though.

STAY ON THIS TOPIC: "Jason Wilcox"

I absolutely have! I think you once gave me a (deserved) telling off for calling something 'gay' in a derogatory manner.

It wasn't Jason Wilcox though, so back OT from here on in. Thanks for all you do.