should the QPR goal have stood?

Didn't see the game

Boss (QPR fan) is livid about it

I've no idea. hth.

yup, should have.

Fair's fair. Should have stood. Luckily it didn't and we managed to pull off a monumental result with only mostly first teamers, at home. Things are looking rosy atm.

The BBC are generally quite biased towards the 'top 4'

The way the skipped over the disallowed goal in the match report implies to me that is probably should have stood.

Boss is still going mad

Grinding through every cliche he can come up with, Never get anything at OT, Prawn sarnies etc etc.

Originally Posted by Harri Jaffa

The BBC are generally quite biased towards the 'top 4'

The way the skipped over the disallowed goal in the match report implies to me that is probably should have stood.

Boss is still going mad

Grinding through every cliche he can come up with, Never get anything at OT, Prawn sarnies etc etc.

tell him to £#%&! off the babyshambles wannabee

Originally Posted by Fuzzy Dunlop

Fair's fair. Should have stood. Luckily it didn't and we managed to pull off a monumental result with only mostly first teamers, at home. Things are looking rosy atm.

What happened for the goal then.

Originally Posted by antonin jablonsky

What happened for the goal then.

They scored but it wasn't given. It made Mendez's ungiven goal look like an honest mistake.

Originally Posted by antonin jablonsky

What happened for the goal then.

ruled out for offside, he was clearly on, think it was neville playing him on.

Originally Posted by Fuzzy Dunlop

They scored but it wasn't given.

Why not? Why was this incorrect.

Originally Posted by antonin jablonsky

Why not? Why was this incorrect.

Yer man was onside. Neville played him on.

Originally Posted by puressence

tell him to £#%&! off the babyshambles wannabee

Seconded

Originally Posted by Fuzzy Dunlop

Yer man was onside. Neville played him on.

Why would Neville be playing deep enough to keep him onside?

Originally Posted by antonin jablonsky

Why would Neville be playing deep enough to keep him onside?

because hes shit

From the replay I saw it looked like he clearly was offside, though it wasn't a great stream so maybe I missed something. Highligts are on ITV1 tonight at 2340.

Originally Posted by antonin jablonsky

Why would Neville be playing deep enough to keep him onside?

Originally Posted by Ginlarde

because hes shit

What Ginners said. Bit of a broad question there AJ. Bit like asking why was Neville embarrased on Saturday.

Originally Posted by scousebasher

From the replay I saw it looked like he clearly was offside, though it wasn't a great stream so maybe I missed something. Highligts are on ITV1 tonight at 2340.

Looked offside to me.

Couldn't give a £#%&! anyway.

Anti football for most of last night. Deserved to be knocked out.

Originally Posted by Fuzzy Dunlop

What Ginners said. Bit of a broad question there AJ. Bit like asking why was Neville embarrased on Saturday.

Broad yet easily answered, "legs have gone" sadly.

Originally Posted by antonin jablonsky

Broad yet easily answered, "legs have gone" sadly.

hmm, not sure if its just his legs, he clearly has no understanding of positioning anymore either

Originally Posted by Ginlarde

hmm, not sure if its just his legs, he clearly has no understanding of positioning anymore either

legs are ususally vital to positioning