United Forum
Go Back   United Forum > Manchester United > Football
Closed Thread
 
Unread 23-03-2011, 10:30 AM
That Boy Ronaldo!
 
Default Safe Standing

Decent article here looking at the debate that is Safe Standing, you can also put your name forward at the official Football Supporters Federation.

http://www.fsf.org.uk/petitions/safestanding.php

Quote:
The tough challenge facing the fans campaigning passionately for standing to be allowed at top-flight football is that in principle the time for their argument has come, while in practice the authorities argue it has long gone. Approaching 22 years since the horrors of the Hillsborough disaster, the families of those who died remain vehemently opposed to standing.

Given that history, no government sees any political capital in a change, a point made forcefully by the sports minister, Hugh Robertson, on Monday, at the first ever round-table meeting on the issue between the Football Supporters' Federation and the football authorities, government and police.

The Football Association, Premier League and Football League's position is that all-seat stadiums have been vital furniture in the game's rehabilitation after Hillsborough, and, crucially, that grounds have been rebuilt since without the steepness and configuration required for terracing. They argued that even if some clubs might consider re-introducing standing, recognising it can be safe, that it allows lower ticket prices and produces a better atmosphere, it would be difficult and expensive.

Yet as the Football Supporters' Federation (FSF) launches an online petition, calling for signatures from the thousands of fans who still yearn to stand a generation since they were required to sit, it is clear the opposition has become markedly more measured. Robertson stressed he is very unlikely to allow any change, but agreed at least to look at any strong evidence to show modern terracing can be safe, is able to be policed, and that there is a widespread demand from supporters.

Don Foster, the Liberal Democrat sports spokesman who organised the meeting and has tabled a private member's bill calling for safe standing to be permitted, was positive afterwards. "The door is ajar now," he said. "We will establish the solid evidence required. Real fans have been losing out for years, paying high ticket prices for seats. Now they need to make their voices heard."

Nobody at the meeting seriously argued that standing is unsafe, or that its reintroduction would push football back to the bad old days. The FSF has battled to get that point heard for two exhausting decades – that Hillsborough was not caused by the terracing itself. According to Lord Justice Taylor's report, the fault was South Yorkshire police's negligence managing the crowd, Sheffield Wednesday's shameful mismanagement of their ground and the safety of the terraces, and Sheffield City Council allowing matches to be played there despite not having updated Wednesday's safety certificate for a decade.

The supporters groups – and the FA – opposed the all-seat recommendation in Taylor's final report, which the judge argued would be safer, more comfortable, and "have distinct advantages in achieving crowd control". The FSF has argued with that ever since, that the response to a disaster caused by a negligent approach to fans' safety became an opportunity for "crowd control": to police potential hooliganism more keenly and gentrify the grounds.

The FA, shoulder-to-shoulder with the fans' groups then, argued that compelling clubs to have all-seat stadiums would break up the emotional, traditional culture of support, reduce capacities, and lead to higher ticket prices.

Taylor decided none of these need happen, and famously referred to seat prices at Ibrox then – £6, compared to the £4 cost of standing. "Not a prohibitive price or differential," he observed. That badly misread the top clubs' feverish impatience to raise prices; staring at the game's wreckage then, he did not conceive of today's £40 and £50 tickets which have priced a generation of young adults out of going to Premier League matches.

The FSF has never wavered from its view on Taylor. Malcolm Clarke, its chairman, argues: "Fans lost a cherished culture when standing at matches was outlawed in the top two divisions. We argue clubs should be given the choice. Many fans show every game that they still want to stand – by standing in seating areas which is itself a safety risk. Following yesterday's very good meeting, we will be gathering further evidence to respond to the concerns of those who are not yet convinced."

The FA now sides with the leagues, arguing that seating should remain compulsory. The Premier League's representative, Bill Bush, barely raised the question of safety on Monday, arguing instead that seating had encouraged more families, women and ethnic minorities to matches, and there is no demand from clubs to introduce standing. Ruth Shaw, chief executive of the Football Licensing Authority, which oversees the post-Taylor safety regime, argues: "It is generally accepted that seating is safer, more comfortable and enables better crowd management."

Yet the FLA does not press too hard the argument that seating is safer. Injury rates at football are thankfully low now, whether in all-seat stadiums – in which 0.009% of fans sustained an injury last season – or League One and Two stadiums – where 0.004% of fans were injured. After being challenged by the FSF, the FLA no longer even claims this lower rate in a generally very safe activity is because terracing remains at some grounds; the figures themselves do not prove that.

Acknowledging that: "Overall most injuries [are] minor", the FLA figures show that last season 419 injuries were sustained from trips, slips and falls, 108 were people hit with the ball, and 31 people fell off their seats or another object. Taylor would have given profound thanks for the figure of only four people sustaining a crush, from a total attendance in the season of 34,564,307 – 0.00001%.

Andy Holt, the assistant chief constable of South Yorkshire police who represented the Association of Chief Police Officers on Monday, firmly classes standing as a crowd control rather than safety issue. "I agree you can have safe standing," he says. "However, I would want to be assured that any form of standing would not make it more difficult to steward crowds, to identify somebody causing trouble, and that crowd density would mean we could intervene if we needed to."

That the police, football authorities and FLA no longer raise the spectre of a Hillsborough-type disaster whenever the subject of standing is raised is partly due to persistent FSF campaigning. It has gathered evidence from Germany, where some Bundesliga grounds have terracing with closely spaced barriers allowing just one or two rows of people in between, making crushes all but impossible.

In March 1993, considering its response to hooliganism, the German Football Federation decided against introducing all-seat stadiums, opting instead to make terracing safer.

"Abolishing standing areas would make it considerably more difficult for socially disadvantaged football supporters to attend their team's matches," the federation said then. "Football, being a people's sport, should not banish the socially disadvantaged from its stadia, and it should not place its social function in doubt."

German grounds teem with young adults, who pay as little as €14 (£12.15), to stand at, for example, the 80,552-capacity Westfalenstadion, home of the Bundesliga leaders Borussia Dortmund.

Here, so many years after Hillsborough, a genuine debate is finally becoming possible about the potential benefits and the genuine risk of allowing people to stand. But with all this time passed, and the spectre of disaster always hovering over the subject, any change would be an uphill struggle.
It's a great idea, and something that should be brought back. But wont happen anytime soon due to the sheer amount of debt that's in the English game at the moment.

Could you see the big clubs, paying out x £ millions to rip out seats and incorporate safe standing with the potential of lower ticket prices and no rise in attendances?

If it ever happens, the first sign of trouble, it'll be ripped out.
 
Unread 23-03-2011, 10:38 AM
TravellingRed
 
Default Re: Safe Standing

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Boy Ronaldo!
Decent article here looking at the debate that is Safe Standing, you can also put your name forward at the official Football Supporters Federation.

http://www.fsf.org.uk/petitions/safestanding.php



It's a great idea, and something that should be brought back. But wont happen anytime soon due to the sheer amount of debt that's in the English game at the moment.

Could you see the big clubs, paying out x £ millions to rip out seats and incorporate safe standing with the potential of lower ticket prices and no rise in attendances?

If it ever happens, the first sign of trouble, it'll be ripped out.
It might happen if people stop going en masse but I can't see it myself. They want you to be well behaved and toe the party line, standing doesn't encourage that.
 
Unread 23-03-2011, 11:07 AM
The Watcher
 
Default Re: Safe Standing

The only people who want standing back at football are the supporters. No one else involved in the game does. That’s why it’ll never happen.

Not sure why the Police are having any input into this. If it was up to them to make the rules, we’d all be compelled by law to be in our homes by 8pm, with cctv camera’s in every room
 
Unread 23-03-2011, 11:10 AM
elephantstone
 
Default Re: Safe Standing

TBH I dont mind standing at aways as its expected but I couldnt stand all the time at OT. I'm a bloody martyr to my back so I would stay in K-stand and leave itto the young guns.
 
Unread 23-03-2011, 11:23 AM
dunk
 
Thumbs up Re: Safe Standing

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Watcher
If it was up to them to make the rules, we’d all be compelled by law to be in our homes by 8pm
Tbh, I want that in place for when my daughters reach their teenage years.

 
Unread 23-03-2011, 11:38 AM
CyrilSkeer
 
Default Re: Safe Standing

On the petition signatures/comments a Liverpool fan has added the below;
FFS get a grip

Alan Clarke Liverpool As far as I'm concerned, anyone who agrees with this petition agrees that the lives of football supporters (or is that just the lives of Liverpudlians?) are worthless. It's outrageous that this should even be suggested. How about spending your time fighting for justice for those 96, rather than this abomination.
 
Unread 23-03-2011, 11:40 AM
dunk
 
Default Re: Safe Standing

Quote:
Originally Posted by CyrilSkeer
On the petition signatures/comments a Liverpool fan has added the below;
FFS get a grip

Alan Clarke Liverpool As far as I'm concerned, anyone who agrees with this petition agrees that the lives of football supporters (or is that just the lives of Liverpudlians?) are worthless. It's outrageous that this should even be suggested. How about spending your time fighting for justice for those 96, rather than this abomination.
I know it's been asked, but wtf would 'justice' actually constitute? What are they hoping to achieve?
 
Unread 23-03-2011, 11:45 AM
Charlestown Rouge
 
Default Re: Safe Standing

Quote:
Originally Posted by dunk
I know it's been asked, but wtf would 'justice' actually constitute? What are they hoping to achieve?
We should really be petitioning against drunken supporters trying to get into a football match without tickets.
 
Unread 23-03-2011, 11:47 AM
dunk
 
Default Re: Safe Standing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlestown Rouge
We should really be petitioning against drunken supporters trying to get into a football match without tickets.
That would make sense.

We could just petition for Scousers to be banned from attending football matches full stop. And the rest of us could get on with being civilised-ish.
 
Unread 23-03-2011, 11:51 AM
CyrilSkeer
 
Default Re: Safe Standing

Looking further down the petition it is scattered with scousers with a chip on their shoulder, playing the victim. This is nothing to do with Liverpool FC or it's supporters, nor is it a slight on the fans who died.
It's raising a debate on what is a viable and safe option that should be available in football stadia.
 
Unread 23-03-2011, 11:52 AM
Charlestown Rouge
 
Default Re: Safe Standing

Nice one Cyril
 
Unread 23-03-2011, 11:53 AM
waynes ear's
 
Default Re: Safe Standing

scousers vehemently against standing yet stand constantly on the kop?

£#%&! off.
 
Unread 23-03-2011, 11:54 AM
red red robbo
 
Default Re: Safe Standing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlestown Rouge
We should really be petitioning against drunken supporters trying to get into a football match without tickets.
 
Unread 23-03-2011, 11:55 AM
The Watcher
 
Default Re: Safe Standing

Of course, it’s pure coincidence that deaths and general pandemonium at big games always involves those @#%&!s. Heysel, Hillsborough, Athens...
 
Unread 23-03-2011, 11:58 AM
dunk
 
Default Re: Safe Standing

How many disaster's have they had in Germany that involved people stood in the stands drinking beer at football games?
 
Unread 23-03-2011, 12:05 PM
Sloane
 
Default Re: Safe Standing

it will never happen because of the uproar from Liverpool because of Hillsbrough, when that was pretty much down to shit Police control and fences.

but you know what they are like, cant listen to reason and once they have an idea in their head there is no room for debate
 
Unread 23-03-2011, 12:55 PM
Woody Creek
 
Default Re: Safe Standing

Scousers are up in arms about bringing safe standing terraces to English stadia because Dalglish is against it (says it's 'an insult to the 96')

Hang on a second. If ANY ONE except Dalglish had said that, they would be going mental saying that the whole thing was the police's fault and that blaming it on terracing or fans is wrong etc. But because he says it they've forgotten that particular line of attack.
 
Unread 23-03-2011, 02:48 PM
dodger
 
Default Re: Safe Standing

Quote:
Originally Posted by CyrilSkeer
On the petition signatures/comments a Liverpool fan has added the below;
FFS get a grip

Alan Clarke Liverpool As far as I'm concerned, anyone who agrees with this petition agrees that the lives of football supporters (or is that just the lives of Liverpudlians?) are worthless. It's outrageous that this should even be suggested. How about spending your time fighting for justice for those 96, rather than this abomination.
The thick @#%&! will go down as a signature for the proposal though.
 
Unread 23-03-2011, 04:04 PM
andyroo
 
Default Re: Safe Standing

Hillsborough and Ibrox were caused by people entering and exiting in large numbers, not how they were housed inside the stadium. That's what caused the deaths at Bradford as well, the poor buggers were trapped.

The one disaster that is directly attributable to fans standing is, er, Heysel.

Quote:
Originally Posted by elephantstone
TBH I dont mind standing at aways as its expected but I couldnt stand all the time at OT. I'm a bloody martyr to my back so I would stay in K-stand and leave itto the young guns.
But you see, that's the other advantage of having a terraced section. Means those of us who DO want to sit can do so without it stopping the young 'uns standing together and roaring their heads off. It's a win win really.
 
Unread 23-03-2011, 04:13 PM
The Watcher
 
Default Re: Safe Standing

Quote:
Originally Posted by andyroo
It's a win win really.
Unfortunately, the UK is a nanny/police state, where the authorities are desperate to control every part of our lives. Sit down, shut up and give us your £#%&!ing money. That’s what the match going ‘experience’ of the Premier League is. If you don’t, well they can trace who you are from the seat you (supposedly) sat in.
Closed Thread
Similar Threads for: Safe Standing
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Safe Standing redhegemony Football 38 30-04-2020 12:49 PM
Safe standing HolyMackrelDoodleBonkon Football 49 08-06-2018 06:44 PM
Celtic Park - safe standing redhegemony Football 23 05-05-2016 03:53 PM
The 'Safe Standing' debate Sparky*** Football 36 15-12-2014 11:56 PM
Safe standing looking more realistic? Zorg Football 68 15-02-2014 05:39 PM
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:27 AM.
Copyright ©2006 - 2024 utdforum.com. This site is in no way affiliated to Manchester United Football Club.