Hillsborough Disaster.

just watching match of the day from last night

st.gary saying "the 96 have finally been cleared of any blame"

wtf ???

who has ever said that the 96, who got to the ground early doors, were to blame ??

£#%&!ing trotsky didnt airbrush past events this well

More United bashing by a scouser on 5 Live now :shakehead:

success for them is nothing without turning it into a dig against us.

We had better muller them next week

Discussing it on Sunday Supplement now in a gentle softly, softly tone akin to a parent telling their 5 year old daughter that her pet rabbit has died. 'Poor Liverpool, POOR, POOR Liverpool'.

Naturally evil Utd fans are copping it over yesterday and the trouble and disrepect they shall no doubt exhibit next week.

@#%&!s.

Originally Posted by Pop

Discussing it on Sunday Supplement now in a gentle softly, softly tone akin to a parent telling their 5 year old daughter that her pet rabbit has died. 'Poor Liverpool, POOR, POOR Liverpool'.

Naturally evil Utd fans are copping it over yesterday and the trouble and disrepect they shall no doubt exhibit next week.

@#%&!s.

Thank that senile old @#%&! for that!

Instead of coming out defending our fans, pointing out that the song isn't about Hillsborough he's hung us out to dry

Nice to hear the C and D words from Hansen last night too

Originally Posted by razzle

Nice to hear the C and D words from Hansen last night too

I actually lolled at that when he uttered those words, it's vermin bingo - 'HOUSE !!'

from the guardian comments section. it seems this report exonerates them for heysel too

Heysel remains a disaster that also demands deeper examination. The prevailing consensus that "Liverpool hooligans" were solely responsible for that tragedy is way off the mark. The mangled barriers of Sections X & Y stood as evidence of a disaster that may have easily occurred in those blocks before and during the actual disaster in Section Z. Some of the same questions many now ask of the authorities regarding Hillsborough must also be asked of those responsible for Heysel. Who at UEFA choose and authorized Heysel as a venue -- did any money change hands in the award of the final to Brussels? Who was responsible for the under and unmanned ticket entrances at Heysel Stadium? Who at UEFA was responsible for issuing more tickets to Juventus than Liverpool -- did money change hands for this 'favour'? Why was it that the authorities choose to collect flag poles from supporters 500 yards before the entrance, yet have not bother to collect tickets at the rudimentary turnstiles? Who at Brussels City Council oversaw the safety of the stadium? If such an authority did exist, how did it allow tens of thousands of people to mass on crumbling concrete steps that were constantly giving way as the number of supporters grew in X&Y? Who was the Belgian police commander in charge on that night and what orders did he or she give in advance of the crush X & Y? Did the authorities even notice? During the overflow of people from X & Y into Z, and during the confrontations between the rival supporters in Z, why was the response of the Police almost non existent and haphazard? How many of the 39 could had survived had they received treatments in the minutes after the wall collapse?


Heysel was the context ("drunken liverpool supporters is what did it") that enabled the public to readily accept the lies and cover up of Hillsborough, yet as we move closer to justice for the 96, we remain as far from the truth about the ill confluence of factors that left 39 dead at Heysel as we ever have.

unbelievable

Basically it seems Liverpool fans can behave exactly as they like and any damage they cause is the fault of the authorities for not stopping them.

Originally Posted by irk

from the guardian comments section. it seems this report exonerates them for heysel too



unbelievable

tell it to the juve fans. oh, wait, they did




















always the victims :shakehead:

Originally Posted by irk

from the guardian comments section. it seems this report exonerates them for heysel too



unbelievable

Liverpool's fans were more guilty at Heysel than the police were at Hillsborough. Neither set out to kill but did. Therefore they face the consequences and indeed justice.

The Sun's apology's 'not enough'. Yet the Juve fans get 'here, have a banner'.

£#%&!ing £#%&!ers.

it's as if they don't realise that their rioting fans were shown live on television around the world killing those Juve fans

Originally Posted by borsuk

tell it to the juve fans. oh, wait, they did




















always the victims :shakehead:

Originally Posted by irk

from the guardian comments section. it seems this report exonerates them for heysel too



unbelievable

Name and shame.

Originally Posted by red in cumbria

Name and shame.

LORDWALNEY

16 September 2012 11:57AM

footbal98854687
16 September 2012 11:05AM

The campaign for truth was entirely appropriate.

The subsequent glee with which many Liverpool fans are revelling in it, and the way they're painting themselves as entirely innocent of other offences and suggesting those evil United fans are going to disrespect them is not. United fans will be painted as the aggressors next week, but we remember the Munich banners at Heysel. We remember the Munich chants. We remember shit in cups and rocks at ambulances, smashing up the toilets at OT and the Munich graffiti, and we remember the booing of Evra.

========================

Wow what a childish post.

Do you think Liverpool supporters don't remember your Hillsborough banners, your Hillsborough chants, the shit in cups that you threw, your rocks at ambulances, smashing up the toilets at Anfield, and we remember the booing of Suarez.

There's clearly a village somewhere without it's idiot.

Originally Posted by Switching Off

LORDWALNEY

16 September 2012 11:57AM

footbal98854687
16 September 2012 11:05AM

The campaign for truth was entirely appropriate.

The subsequent glee with which many Liverpool fans are revelling in it, and the way they're painting themselves as entirely innocent of other offences and suggesting those evil United fans are going to disrespect them is not. United fans will be painted as the aggressors next week, but we remember the Munich banners at Heysel. We remember the Munich chants. We remember shit in cups and rocks at ambulances, smashing up the toilets at OT and the Munich graffiti, and we remember the booing of Evra.

========================

Wow what a childish post.

Do you think Liverpool supporters don't remember your Hillsborough banners, your Hillsborough chants, the shit in cups that you threw, your rocks at ambulances, smashing up the toilets at Anfield, and we remember the booing of Suarez.

There's clearly a village somewhere without it's idiot.

"I know you are but what am I" is the level of argument form a scouser.

Originally Posted by Switching Off

LORDWALNEY

16 September 2012 11:57AM

footbal98854687
16 September 2012 11:05AM

The campaign for truth was entirely appropriate.

The subsequent glee with which many Liverpool fans are revelling in it, and the way they're painting themselves as entirely innocent of other offences and suggesting those evil United fans are going to disrespect them is not. United fans will be painted as the aggressors next week, but we remember the Munich banners at Heysel. We remember the Munich chants. We remember shit in cups and rocks at ambulances, smashing up the toilets at OT and the Munich graffiti, and we remember the booing of Evra.

========================

Wow what a childish post.

Do you think Liverpool supporters don't remember your Hillsborough banners, your Hillsborough chants, the shit in cups that you threw, your rocks at ambulances, smashing up the toilets at Anfield, and we remember the booing of Suarez.

There's clearly a village somewhere without it's idiot.

What Hillsborough banners?

Originally Posted by Zorg

What Hillsborough banners?

There never was any

I think that's the point, he's just replied with exactly what was levelled at them saying we have done the same