Rasmus Hojlund?

Originally Posted by Jack Duckworth

"Rasmus needs to score more goals!"

*Rasmus scores a goal*

"Not like that!"

Originally Posted by Hyman_Roth

Not knocking his goal but I thought the keeper should have saved it or at least parried it. I did only watch it once so I might be wrong.

So important he scored though - he’s been having a difficult time since injury - no service, bad touches, not brilliant positioning etc. that should give him a boost for the final.

Desperate for another striker to take the load off him during the course of a season so he can be rotated sensibly.

"He's a nice lad, but his shit stinks"

tbf it's nice to say it about someone who isn't our goalkeeper for once

Originally Posted by History

tbf it's nice to say it about someone who isn't our goalkeeper for once

He was recently, so it does track.

Can we safely assume he has a tidy scandi eye candy GF?

Originally Posted by est.1878

Can we safely assume he has a tidy scandi eye candy GF?

https://www.instagram.com/laurarhod?...9qbTR5amkyag==

Originally Posted by Baron

Shouldn’t have passed to Rashers when through.

should have played a better pass.

Originally Posted by jem

should have played a better pass.

I've seen fat lads attack a salad bar with more enthusiasm than Rashford in the box.

Originally Posted by Jack Duckworth

"Rasmus needs to score more goals!"

*Rasmus scores a goal*

"Not like that!"

duckers knows...

Originally Posted by Jethro

I've seen fat lads attack a salad bar with more enthusiasm than Rashford in the box.

maybe, but he held his run perfectly to stay onside and he would have had a simple finish. it wouldn't have been rasmus's fault. but the pass never gave rashford a chance to show his lack of effort.

Originally Posted by jem

maybe, but he held his run perfectly to stay onside and he would have had a simple finish. it wouldn't have been rasmus's fault. but the pass never gave rashford a chance to show his lack of effort.

It looked like Hojlund was in two minds about passing; he should have just taken the shot himself but he obviously was looking to make the pass. Probably had a thousand flashbacks to Rashford fluffing his lines in front of goal which lead to hesitation.

Wasn’t a great pass.

Originally Posted by NedKelly

It looked like Hojlund was in two minds about passing; he should have just taken the shot himself but he obviously was looking to make the pass. Probably had a thousand flashbacks to Rashford fluffing his lines in front of goal which lead to hesitation.

Wasn’t a great pass.

he made a decision. whether it was the correct one or not, he should have played a better pass. greenwood would have scored.

It was indecision and it cost. As a striker, his instinct is to shoot but the better option is to pass. Split second indecision cost him.

He should have shot.

My son is a striker. His view was Rasmus should've shot. "Back yourself to score".

Originally Posted by jem

maybe, but he held his run perfectly to stay onside and he would have had a simple finish. it wouldn't have been rasmus's fault. but the pass never gave rashford a chance to show his lack of effort.

Was Rashford onside? It was close and maybe he thought he had to play it back?

It was a lot to consider for a 21 year old lad in a split second in any event.

Originally Posted by suedeshoes

It was indecision and it cost. As a striker, his instinct is to shoot but the better option is to pass. Split second indecision cost him.

He should have shot.

My son is a striker. His view was Rasmus should've shot. "Back yourself to score".

I'm sure his indecision contributed to the pass being poor. the pass was easier than the shot. as a striker (with no sons), I would have shot. if rashford had complained, I'd have asked him whether he'd have passed to me in the same situation. although I would probably only have used two words.

Originally Posted by atticusgrinch

Was Rashford onside?

yes. and, if rashford had been offside, playing it back wouldn't have helped, would it? it was just a shit pass.

not sure one can claim to be a striker without ever having kicked a ball tbh

Originally Posted by larry

not sure one can claim to be a striker without ever having kicked a ball tbh

true. I'm a striker. how about you?

https://www.instagram.com/p/C7Bd-H9AuT_/?igsh=MTVjMWZ1NWxsd3JtZQ==

16 goals and 2 assists in his debut season when players actively avoided passing to him.

Anyone who doesn’t get it is, quite frankly, a #@&%!.

Originally Posted by Zorg

16 goals and 2 assists in his debut season when players actively avoided passing to him.

Anyone who doesn’t get it is, quite frankly, a #@&%!.

Yep. Very decent start for him