Quote:
Originally Posted by Ethers
Well yes. You seemed to be implying their first half performances were both equivalent, or at least similar.
Or did you mean something else by describing them both as dire?!
You were wrong at HT. And even more wrong at FT
|
I didn't say he was dire in the second half; rather the opposite when I said he'd had a good last 20 minutes (at the time).
they were both dire in the first half. soz. that's not lumping them in together. hannibal was dire because he threw himself into rash challenges and made poor choices with the ball, although he did run around a lot. The Scottish Player was dire because he fouled constantly and is a pathetic player who contributed nothing.
if you think hannibal was excellent, good for you. you clearly think your argument is excellent, too, but it isn't. and there is no chance of it having a good 20 minutes either.