|
||||
|
||||
Re: it's not often you get to see half a team of players who weren't good enough for united
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
|||
Re: it's not often you get to see half a team of players who weren't good enough for united
Quote:
you really must get a better grasp of the english language |
|
||||
|
||||
Re: it's not often you get to see half a team of players who weren't good enough for united
Quote:
£#%&!ing hell, have you got no ambition? our midfield is absolutely shocking, our defence swings wildly between being impregnable and gifting goals, foster is a £#%&!ing joke and when rooney is off form we don't look capable of anything close to a surprising move. we're still top of the league, of course. what does that tell you about the rest? look around our team and there's evra and rooney getting it done week after week. after that, you've got some fading lights and some never-will-bes. the football today was shit. at least in 2005 it looked like we just needed to replace keane. |
|
||||
|
||||
Re: it's not often you get to see half a team of players who weren't good enough for united
Quote:
valencia has been here two minutes, judging him so harshly on that evidence is ridiculous, while judging somebody whose career has barely started like welbeck is even worse. as for the rest, perhaps they wouldn't be missed. but they would be replaced by similar players who would also have better and worse days. |
|
|||
|
|||
Re: it's not often you get to see half a team of players who weren't good enough for united
Quote:
foster clearly isnt good enough or is not ready, if he never played again it wouldnt be a problem oshea is a good squad player but again if he died tomorrow its not really an issue is it, how he is playing in front of brown i dont know, let alone fabio welbeck hasnt done it yet (which is understandable) but we could get rid tmorrow and not miss him. Valencia wouldnt be missed and id suggest nani has 2-3 games of that to save his career but at this stage he wouldnt be missed either |
|
||||
|
||||
Re: it's not often you get to see half a team of players who weren't good enough for united
Quote:
On another note playing Wellbeck today was probably one of the worst choices I have ever seen but then again I've not really seen what the boy can offer as I've said before last season (in other threads). Wellbeck was wide and continually drifted in, Rooney went wide looking for space as we all know from last season and that nullifys him and Berba came well too deep. The first half of today was one of the more depressing 45 minutes I've watched. far too early to say we cant win the league again as Chelsea have yet to face anyone who are a genuine threat. It kind of annoys me that on the season we can get our 19th league title we fail to spend on quality but seem to just weaken ourselves |
|
|||
|
|||
Re: it's not often you get to see half a team of players who weren't good enough for united
Quote:
The United of today just seem to pace themselves. There's no sense of a proper desire to entertain, unless that entertainment involves conceding shit goals playing shit in the first half and then chasing the game second half. |
|
||||
|
||||
Re: it's not often you get to see half a team of players who weren't good enough for united
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Re: it's not often you get to see half a team of players who weren't good enough for united
it's one £#%&!ing game lads. why draw season-threatening conclusions from yesterday and not from the 8 on the bounce we'd won before it, including wins over arsenal, city and spurs? why £#%&!ing jump on the first (ok, second) bad performance of the season and immediately start whining like we're disappearing down mid-table? talk about knee-jerk :shakehead: or rather, not knee-jerk, because i get the distinct impression that some have been waiting, toys in hand, no doubt impatiently, for the first bad day. and out of the pram they go in a welter of 'i told you so' threads. maybe it's just me, but no matter how desperate i was to prove some thesis of 'player x is shite' or 'we're crap without ronaldo' etc i'd still think twice about using top of the league, top of the cl group, 8 wins from 9 and wins over spurs, arsenal and city as my evidence. just a thought, mind.
personally i'm amazed that we've actually had a decent start to the season for once and that we've been playing such great football so early. promises to be a cracking season and, from what i've seen so far, i think us and arsenal look a cut above the rest. |
|
||||
|
||||
Re: it's not often you get to see half a team of players who weren't good enough for united
Quote:
You can't win every game of the season and you are obviously not going to perform to the standard we set week in week out and quite honestly after the first half yesterday its a miracle we got a point. What worries me the most is what happens when/if we lose Rooney/Berbatov/Owen for a strech of time or the unthinkable of losing 2 of them at the same time for a few weeks, what ever way people paint it results regardless our front line does look desperately thin. PS. Steve Bruce what a huge manager he is, hes had a great start with Sunderland after the stella work he did at Wigan and Birmingham. Top Fred |
|
||||
|
||||
it's hardly knee-jerk, old badge
I complain when we're winning.
I wasn't unhappy when we went down against spurs, because it was clear we could get back into it. I wasn't even despairing about the first half against sunderland (a bit sad for scholesy, maybe), because it was clear we could get back into it merely by fighting a bit harder and showing our clear superiority. equally, we were very lucky to beat arsenal. but we really shouldn't be judging purely on results. performances matter. and getting knocked around by a big lump up front and not closing down bent... on that basis, any championship side would give us a headache (like derby and their unmarked strikers). barcelona were there for taking in the cl final as well. they scored a goal against the run of play due to three defensive howlers and we sagged. rooney had an off day and ronaldo, after a 10-minute "look at me" session didn't do much. everyone else says we were taught a lesson, but even fletch and ando could (probably) pass the ball around prettily if no one put them under any pressure. when ferdinand and vidic can't spot little messi when he is the only player in a position to receive the ball..... I'm sorry, I just don't believe in our midfield until hargreaves is fit. and even then we need some decent wingers. if you like valencia, you probably liked duff, robben, etc as well and thought kanchelskis was better than giggs (he was better than valencia, though). coppell and hill..... olsen and strachan.... giggs and sharpe... giggs and beckham.... giggs and ronaldo..... er..... nani and valencia. robson.... keane..... er.... fletcher. I don't think it's unrealistic to expect better quality than this. |
|
|||
|
|||
Re: it's not often you get to see half a team of players who weren't good enough for united
Quote:
£#%&! off back to brixton you £#%&!ing gobshite |
Similar Threads for: it's not often you get to see half a team of players who weren't good enough for united | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Roy Keane names four players who 'weren't helping' Manchester United last season | fred tissue | Football Auto-Threads | 0 | 02-02-2023 12:20 PM |
Marcus Rashford: Man United 'simply weren't good enough' in the Europa League final | fred tissue | Football Auto-Threads | 0 | 28-05-2021 01:00 AM |
Ole Gunnar Solskjaer admits Manchester United ‘weren’t good enough’ after another semi-final defeat | fred tissue | Football Auto-Threads | 0 | 07-01-2021 01:00 AM |
Players that weren't top top united quality | thatsfuctit | Football | 42 | 31-10-2007 08:28 AM |