unnoticed on saturday...

2
0
0
7
5
17
0
0
0
0
25
===
56


not a point that's ever likely to be made in the media, of course.




btw, for contrast the media darlings break down like this:

undisclosed
11
12
0
2
0
2
8
13
4
0
===
52

hard to see how this went unnoticed

Originally Posted by borsuk

2
0
0
7
5
17
0
0
0
0
25
===
56


not a point that's ever likely to be made in the media, of course.




btw, for contrast the media darlings break down like this:

undisclosed
11
12
0
2
0
2
8
13
4
0
===
52

what about the berties??

Originally Posted by The Stella Fella

what about the berties??

i'd need essien's calculator for that.



city's and spurs' starting 11s were way more expensive. so was villa's. and, of course, the dippers'. if almunia's undisclosed fee was 4m (seems reasonable) then we had the cheapest starting 11 out of all of them.

Don't say stuff like that. Don't you know, according to Benitez, United spend 5 billion every summer on reserve wingers, whilst Liverpool have no money at all.

What was City's worth? The defence and keeper must've been close on £40m.

Originally Posted by borsuk

2
0
0
7
5
17
0
0
0
0
25
===
56


not a point that's ever likely to be made in the media, of course.




btw, for contrast the media darlings break down like this:

undisclosed
11
12
0
2
0
2
8
13
4
0
===
52

Are they number of gold coins in a drawer?

I see you meant Arsenal

surprised you are not adding the numbers from the bench though!!

and don't bother replying to that if at the end you will just say I am anti united.

Originally Posted by rafabio

and don't bother replying to that if at the end you will just say I am anti united.

Well, you are.

Originally Posted by borsuk

2
0
0
7
5
17
0
0
0
0
25
===
56


not a point that's ever likely to be made in the media, of course.




btw, for contrast the media darlings break down like this:

undisclosed
11
12
0
2
0
2
8
13
4
0
===
52

What the £#%&!ing hell is this thread about?

Originally Posted by BryanRobson'sLiver

What the £#%&!ing hell is this thread about?

Fans of LOST know the score.

Originally Posted by BryanRobson'sLiver

What the £#%&!ing hell is this thread about?

Cost of our starting 11 as compared to the cost of Arsenals

Originally Posted by rafabio

surprised you are not adding the numbers from the bench though!!

I will...

2
0
0
18
30
3
16 (approx)
=
33 (89 in total)

350k
0
0
2.75
125k (ish)
=
3 approx (56 in total)

Although I think Arse are missing a few key players (Gallas, Fabregas, Arse-Shaving inc).

Originally Posted by Mao's Favourite Starling

Cost of our starting 11 as compared to the cost of Arsenals

Excellent. Well to fill in the blanks Fabiansky cost 2 million and I think Nasri cost 15.8 rather than 13

Originally Posted by Sullingtons

I will...

2
0
0
18
30
3
16 (approx)
=
33 (89 in total)

350k
0
0
2.75
125k (ish)
=
3 approx (56 in total)

Although I think Arse are missing a few key players.

Like 15 million Arshavin, 7.5 million Eduado, 5 million Ramsey etc

Rio, Anderson.

I don't think it's the best point to make tbh borsuk.

Originally Posted by Sullingtons

I don't think it's the best point to make tbh borsuk.

he will now spend the rest of the day explaining why you are wrong.